Page 40 - Read Online
P. 40

Özbek et al. Carbon Footprints 2025, 4, 30  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/cf.2025.43  Page 19 of 21

               Ethics approval and consent to participate
               Not applicable.


               Consent for publication
               Not applicable.


               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2025.


               REFERENCES
               1.       Acheampong, A. O.; Boateng, E.; Annor, C. B. Do corruption, income inequality and redistribution hasten transition towards
                   (non)renewable energy economy? Struct. Chang. Econ. Dyn. 2024, 68, 329-54.  DOI
               2.       Feng, Y.; Yan, Y.; Shi, K.; Zhang, Z. Reducing carbon emission at the corporate level: Does artificial intelligence matter? Environ.
                   Impact. Assess. Rev. 2025, 114, 107911.  DOI
               3.       Stern, D. I. The environmental Kuznets curve after 25 years. J. Bioecon. 2017, 19, 7-28.  DOI
               4.       Grossman, G. M.; Krueger, A. B. Economic growth and the environment. Q. J. Econ. 1995, 110, 353-77.  DOI
               5.       Stokey, N. L. Are there limits to growth? Int. Econ. Rev. 1998, 39, 1.  DOI
               6.       Aslanidis, N. Environmental kuznets curves for carbon emissions: a critical survey. SSRN. Electron. J. 2009,.  DOI
               7.       Stern, D. I. Energy quality. Ecol. Econ. 2010, 69, 1471-8.  DOI
               8.       Grossman, G. M.; Krueger, A. B. Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau
               9.       of Economic Research; 1991.  DOI
                   Panayotou, T. Empirical tests and policy analysis of environmental degradation at different stages of economic development. WEP;
                   1993.  Available  from:  https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/79436985/93B09_31_engl-libre.pdf?1642973134=&response-content-
                   disposition=inline%3B+filename%3DEmpirical_tests_and_policy_analysis_of_e.pdf&Expires=1761335891&Signature=
                   QDLEFQiEZk-hmVFAlrA5mKVGAXCtkm7s8QVYRWSTLxi7Obh9WhxNkMB0imort2nvXc36QbleIUB0hB6mkq8cdl9L47snqaJTX
                   n0G-V LBm 1 4 5 JZ L n 5 H n E p e0 W 1 c Pn - m- 1 9 cL Xy dyWY ZP0 uAi ylf ASQL kvk x2i Jyn 274 1Sun gv 1xt Y9 aLzI YiL s
                    L-6ep8aG2agbIFOu3VBzXdHz-oPauPZ~-yzdt1C4hv8dSWp jxFds4LC G8JlZYSSuvGsCFFtTs0ZdfnPJQ8DU2HGwDusbSUOzOrksl
                   AiiMIXOGMUyEg1N5CJhdy7Honpz6Mx7zjktt78iHMF4TsH678BtlZnrOQ__&Key-Pair-Id=APKAJLOHF5GGSLRBV4ZA
                    [Last accessed on 28 Oct 2025]
               10.      Yao, S.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, X. Renewable energy, carbon emission and economic growth: a revised environmental Kuznets Curve
                   perspective. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 235, 1338-52.  DOI
               11.      Oliveira, H.; Moutinho, V. Renewable energy, economic growth and economic development nexus: a bibliometric analysis. Energies
                   2021, 14, 4578.  DOI
               12.      Nabaweesi, J.; Kigongo, T. K.; Buyinza, F.; Adaramola, M. S.; Namagembe, S.; Nkote, I. N. Investigating the modern renewable
                   energy-environmental Kuznets curve (REKC) hypothesis for East Africa Community (EAC) countries. Technol. Sustain. 2024, 3, 76-
                   95.  DOI
               13.      Pata, U. K.; Bulut, U.; Balsalobre-Lorente, D.; Chovancová, J. Does income growth affect renewable energy or carbon emissions first?
                   A Fourier-based analysis for renewable and fossil energies. Energy. Strategy. Rev. 2025, 57, 101615.  DOI
               14.      bp. The Statistical Review of World Energy analyses data on world energy markets from the prior year. The Review has been
                   providing timely, comprehensive and objective data to the energy community since 1952. Available from: https://www.bp.com/
                   content/dam/bp/business-sites/en/global/corporate/pdfs/energy-economics/statistical-review/bp-stats-review-2022-full-report.pdf [Last
                   accessed on 25 Oct 2025].
               15.      Adebayo, T. S.; Sevinç, H.; Sevinç, D. E.; Ojekemi, O. S.; Kirikkaleli, D. A wavelet-based model of trade openness with ecological
                   footprint in the MINT economies. Energy. Environ. 2024, 35, 2178-97.  DOI
               16.      Abdullahi, N. M.; Ibrahim, A. A.; Zhang, Q.; Huo, X. Dynamic linkages between financial development, economic growth,
                   urbanization, trade openness, and ecological footprint: an empirical account of ECOWAS countries. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2025, 27,
                   25103-30.  DOI
               17.      Zhou, D.; Kongkuah, M.; Twum, A. K.; Adam, I. Assessing the impact of international trade on ecological footprint in Belt and Road
                   Initiative countries. Heliyon 2024, 10, e26459.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               18.      Zahid, K.; Ali, Q.; Iqbal, Z.; Saghir, S.; Khan, M. T. I. Dynamics between economic activities, eco-friendly energy and ecological
                   footprints: a fresh evidence from BRICS countries. Kybernetes 2025, 54, 1643-59.  DOI
               19.      Hek S, Can M, Brusselaers J. The impact of non-green trade openness on environmental degradation in newly industrialized countries.
                   Ekon. J. Econ. 2024, 2, 66-81.  DOI
               20.      Alqaralleh, H. On the factors influencing the ecological footprint: using an asymmetric quantile regression approach. Manag. Environ.
                   Qual. Int. J. 2024, 35, 220-47.  DOI
               21.      Dam, M. M.; Kaya, F.; Bekun, F. V. How does technological innovation affect the ecological footprint? Evidence from E-7 countries
   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45