Page 79 - Read Online
P. 79

Page 20 of 24                     Luo et al. Carbon Footprints 2025, 4, 14  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/cf.2024.53

               (4) Temporal Resolution Constraints


               While hourly simulations effectively capture broad trends in dynamic exposure, they lack the resolution
               needed to detect minute-level pollution peaks, such as those occurring in traffic-congested areas. Future
               work could incorporate higher-frequency trajectory data and real-time monitoring to refine exposure
               modeling.

               CONCLUSIONS
               Key findings
               This study, using Shanghai’s Baoshan District as a case study, developed a dynamic exposure risk
               assessment framework by integrating the CALPUFF dispersion model with mobile phone signaling data,
               systematically revealing the spatiotemporal distribution patterns and demographic disparities associated
               with traffic-related NO  pollution. The key findings include:
                                  2
               Temporal Dimension: NO  exposure exhibited a clear bimodal diurnal pattern, with noticeable weekday-
                                      2
               weekend variations. Concentrations peaked during the morning and evening rush hours, while weekend
               levels remained consistently lower. This “rhythmic” pattern highlights the strong correlation between traffic
               emissions and human activity, providing a quantitative basis for “time-targeted pollution control”.


               Spatial Dimension: Areas of high exposure risk clustered around ports, logistics corridors, and the outer-
               ring expressways, forming a spatial distribution pattern closely tied to the city’s functional zoning. This
               spatial correlation suggests that uneven transportation infrastructure may contribute to environmental
               inequities.

               Demographic Dimension: Exposure risks varied significantly by gender and age group. Males and working-
               age adults (19-44 years) experienced the highest exposure risks, whereas older adults faced the lowest risks
               due to their infrequent and short-distance travel behavior. These disparities reflect differences in mobility
               patterns and highlight the “social-behavioral and structural” nature of traffic pollution exposure.


               Policy implications
               Time-based traffic management strategies
               Traffic-related NO  exposure peaks during morning and evening rush hours, especially when freight and
                               2
               commuter  traffic  overlap  (e.g.,  during  the  evening  peak).  This  overlap  results  in  elevated  NO
                                                                                                         2
               concentrations and higher exposure levels for local residents. To address this, dynamic traffic management
               strategies should be implemented to reduce pollutant loads during critical time windows. For example,
               staggered commuting schedules and time-specific restrictions on heavy-duty diesel trucks should be
               enforced during weekday peak hours, particularly in densely populated areas along major transport
               corridors such as the Outer Ring Expressway. Diverting freight traffic away from peak residential travel
               times can help reduce cumulative emissions, flatten intra-day pollution peaks, and limit short-term NO
                                                                                                         2
               buildup.

               Targeted protection for high-exposure populations
               Exposure  assessments  reveal  that  highly  mobile  groups,  particularly  working-age  males,  are
               disproportionately affected by traffic-related NO  pollution, while elderly individuals - due to their limited
                                                         2
               mobility - experience the lowest exposure. To address this disparity, targeted interventions should prioritize
               high-exposure populations to reduce health risks and promote environmental equity. For example,
               individuals with frequent commutes and high exposure levels should benefit from tailored protective
   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84