Page 25 - Read Online

Hao et al. Carbon Footprints 2024;3:15 https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/cf.2024.24 Page 21 of 22

AIMS Public Health 2017;4:47-61. DOI PubMed PMC
6. Fang YR, Sun X, Zhang S, et al. Regionally differentiated promotion of electric vehicles in China considering environmental and
human health impacts. Environ Res Lett 2023;18:074022. DOI PubMed PMC
7. Álvarez-Rodríguez C, Martín-Gamboa M, Iribarren D. Sensitivity of operational and environmental benchmarks of retail stores to
decision-makers’ preferences through data envelopment analysis. Sci Total Environ 2020;718:137330. DOI PubMed
8. Gao Z, Li Y, Qian H, Wei M. Environmental, economic, and social sustainability assessment: a case of using contaminated tailings
stabilized by waste-based geopolymer as road base. Sci Total Environ 2023;888:164092. DOI
9. Milovanoff A, Minet L, Cheah L, Posen ID, MacLean HL, Balasubramanian R. Greenhouse gas emission mitigation pathways for
urban passenger land transport under ambitious climate targets. Environ Sci Technol 2021;55:8236-46. DOI PubMed
10. Wang W, Zhong H, Zeng Y, Liu Y, Chen J. A carbon emission calculation model for roadside parking. Int J Environ Res Public
Health 2021;18:1906. DOI PubMed PMC
11. Yu W, Zhang L, Lu R, Ma J. Optimal number of charging station and pricing strategy for the electric vehicle with component
commonality considering consumer range anxiety. PLoS One 2023;18:e0283320. DOI PubMed PMC
12. Zhang R, Yao E, Yang Y. Degradable transportation network with the addition of electric vehicles: network equilibrium analysis.
PLoS One 2017;12:e0184693. DOI PubMed PMC
13. Xie H, Chen B, Dai M, et al. Upgrading passenger vehicle emission standard helps to reduce China’s air pollution risk from
uncertainty in electrification. Environ Sci Technol 2024;58:5325-35. DOI
14. Xu L, Shah SAA, Zameer H, Solangi YA. Evaluating renewable energy sources for implementing the hydrogen economy in Pakistan:
a two-stage fuzzy MCDM approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 2019;26:33202-15. DOI PubMed
15. Qi Y, Kim K. Evaluation of electric car styling based on analytic hierarchy process and Kansei engineering: a study on mainstream
Chinese electric car brands. Heliyon 2024;10:e26999. DOI PubMed PMC
16. de Oliveira WC, de Araújo SR, Rodrigues LF, de Freitas Almeida JF. Sustainable approach towards alternatives for the use of iron ore
tailings in the construction sector using data envelopment analysis methodology. Waste Manag Res 2024;734242X231219632.
PubMed
17. Al-Thani NA, Al-Ansari T, Haouari M. Integrated TOPSIS-COV approach for selecting a sustainable PET waste management
technology: a case study in Qatar. Heliyon 2022;8:e10274. DOI PubMed PMC
18. Sung TW, Li W, Liang Q, Hong C, Fang Q. Research on charging behavior of electric vehicles based on multiple objectives. Math
Biosci Eng 2023;20:15708-36. DOI
19. Taefi TT, Kreutzfeldt J, Held T, et al. Comparative analysis of European examples of freight electric vehicles schemes - A systematic
case study approach with examples from Denmark, Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden and the UK. Cham: Springer; 2014. pp. 495-
504. DOI
20. Chakraborty P, Parker R, Hoque T, et al. Addressing the range anxiety of battery electric vehicles with charging en route. Sci Rep
2022;12:5588. DOI PubMed PMC
21. Fu F, Dong H. Targeted optimal-path problem for electric vehicles with connected charging stations. PLoS One 2019;14:e0220361.
DOI PubMed PMC
22. Liu X, Zhao F, Geng J, Hao H, Liu Z. Comprehensive assessment for different ranges of battery electric vehicles: is it necessary to
develop an ultra-long range battery electric vehicle? iScience 2023;26:106654. DOI PubMed PMC
23. Shekhawat M, Bansal HO. An extensive review on hybrid electric vehicles powered by fuel cell-enabled hybrid energy storage system.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 2023;30:119750-71. DOI PubMed
24. Steadman CL, Higgins CW. Agrivoltaic systems have the potential to meet energy demands of electric vehicles in rural Oregon, US.
Sci Rep 2022;12:4647. DOI PubMed PMC
25. Woody M, Vaishnav P, Craig MT, Lewis GM, Keoleian GA. Charging strategies to minimize greenhouse gas emissions of electrified
delivery vehicles. Environ Sci Technol 2021;55:10108-20. DOI PubMed
26. Sheppard CJR, Jenn AT, Greenblatt JB, Bauer GS, Gerke BF. Private versus shared, automated electric vehicles for U.S. personal
mobility: energy use, greenhouse gas emissions, grid integration, and cost impacts. Environ Sci Technol 2021;55:3229-39. DOI
PubMed
27. Qiao B, Liu J, Huan J. Multi-objective economic emission dispatch of thermal power-electric vehicles considering user's revenue. Soft
Comput 2022;26:12833-49. DOI PubMed PMC
28. Cudjoe D, Wang H, Zhu B. Assessment of the potential energy and environmental benefits of solid waste recycling in China. J
Environ Manage 2021;295:113072. DOI
29. Wen L, Shao H. Analysis of influencing factors of the carbon dioxide emissions in China’s commercial department based on the
STIRPAT model and ridge regression. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 2019;26:27138-47. DOI PubMed
30. Wu LM, Chen BY, Ou LC, et al. [Impact of accelerated electrification under the low carbon path in dongguan city on the coordinated
emission reduction of CO and pollutants]. Huan Jing Ke Xue 2023;44:6653-63. PubMed
2
31. Wu D, Guo F, Field III FR, et al. Regional heterogeneity in the emissions benefits of electrified and lightweighted light-duty vehicles.
Environ Sci Technol 2019;53:10560-70. DOI
32. He L, You Y, Zheng X, et al. The impacts from cold start and road grade on real-world emissions and fuel consumption of gasoline,
diesel and hybrid-electric light-duty passenger vehicles. Sci Total Environ 2022;851:158045. DOI
33. Xie Y, Zuo Q, Guan Q, Wei K, Zhang B. Numerical analysis on a novel CGPFs for improving NOx conversion efficiency and