Page 86 - Read Online
P. 86

Nickoloff et al. Cancer Drug Resist 2021;4:244-63  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/cdr.2020.89                                         Page 262

                   fork-associated DNA damage repair. Mol Cancer Res 2017;15:1503-16.
               191. Amunugama R, Fishel R. Homologous recombination in eukaryotes. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci 2012;110:155-206.
               192. Shrivastav M, Miller CA, De Haro LP, et al. DNA-PKcs and ATM co-regulate DNA double-strand break repair. DNA Repair 2009;8:920-9.
               193. Nickoloff JA, Brenneman MA. Analysis of recombinational repair of DNA double-strand breaks in mammalian cells with I-SceI nuclease.
                   Methods Mol Biol 2004;262:35-52.
               194. Yoshino Y, Endo S, Chen Z, et al. Evaluation of site-specific homologous recombination activity of BRCA1 by direct quantitation of gene
                   editing efficiency. Sci Rep 2019;9:1644.
               195. Price BD, D’Andrea AD. Chromatin remodeling at DNA double-strand breaks. Cell 2013;152:1344-54.
               196. Kaushal S, Freudenreich CH. The role of fork stalling and DNA structures in causing chromosome fragility. Genes Chromosomes Cancer
                   2019;58:270-83.
               197. Wray J, Liu J, Nickoloff JA, Shen Z. Distinct RAD51 associations with RAD52 and BCCIP in response to DNA damage and replication
                   stress. Cancer Res 2008;68:2699-707.
               198. Groth P, Orta ML, Elvers I, et al. Homologous recombination repairs secondary replication induced DNA double-strand breaks after
                   ionizing radiation. Nucleic Acids Res 2012;40:6585-94.
               199. Murnane JP. Telomere dysfunction and chromosome instability. Mutat Res 2012;730:28-36.
               200. Budke B, Logan HL, Kalin JH, et al. RI-1: a chemical inhibitor of RAD51 that disrupts homologous recombination in human cells.
                   Nucleic Acids Res 2012;40:7347-57.
               201. Budke B, Lv W, Kozikowski AP, Connell PP. Recent developments using small molecules to target RAD51: How to best modulate
                   RAD51 for anticancer therapy? ChemMedChem 2016;11:2468-73.
               202. Lv W, Budke B, Pawlowski M, Connell PP, Kozikowski AP. Development of small molecules that specifically inhibit the D-loop activity
                   of RAD51. J Med Chem 2016;59:4511-25.
               203. Mersch J, Jackson MA, Park M, et al. Cancers associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations other than breast and ovarian. Cancer
                   2015;121:269-75.
               204. Sekhar D, Pooja S, Kumar S, Rajender S. RAD51 135G > C substitution increases breast cancer risk in an ethnic-specific manner: a meta-
                   analysis on 21,236 cases and 19,407 controls. Sci Rep 2015;5:11588.
               205. Evans MK, Longo DL. PALB2 mutations and breast-cancer risk. N Engl J Med 2014;371:566-8.
               206. Jette NR, Kumar M, Radhamani S, et al. ATM-deficient cancers provide new opportunities for precision oncology. Cancers 2020;12:687.
               207. Byrum AK, Vindigni A, Mosammaparast N. Defining and modulating ‘BRCAness’. Trends Cell Biol 2019;29:740-51.
               208. Pommier Y, O’Connor MJ, de Bono J. Laying a trap to kill cancer cells: PARP inhibitors and their mechanisms of action. Sci Transl Med
                   2016;8:362ps17.
               209. Yi M, Dong B, Qin S, et al. Advances and perspectives of PARP inhibitors. Exp Hematol Oncol 2019;8:29.
               210. del Rivero J, Kohn EC. PARP inhibitors: the cornerstone of DNA repair-targeted therapies. Oncology 2017;31:265-73.
               211.  Gil Del Alcazar CR, Todorova PK, Habib AA, Mukherjee B, Burma S. Augmented HR repair mediates acquired temozolomide resistance
                   in glioblastoma. Mol Cancer Res 2016;14:928-40.
               212. Zhang X, Ma N, Yao W, Li S, Ren Z. RAD51 is a potential marker for prognosis and regulates cell proliferation in pancreatic cancer.
                   Cancer Cell Int 2019;19:356.
               213. Liu X, Han EK, Anderson M, et al. Acquired resistance to combination treatment with temozolomide and ABT-888 is mediated by both
                   base excision repair and homologous recombination DNA repair pathways. Mol Cancer Res 2009;7:1686-92.
               214. Noordermeer SM, van Attikum H. PARP inhibitor resistance: a tug-of-war in BRCA-mutated cells. Trends Cell Biol 2019;29:820-34.
               215. D’Andrea AD. Mechanisms of PARP inhibitor sensitivity and resistance. DNA Repair 2018;71:172-6.
               216. Tian H, Gao Z, Li H, et al. DNA damage response--a double-edged sword in cancer prevention and cancer therapy. Cancer Lett
                   2015;358:8-16.
               217. Bakr A, Oing C, Kocher S, et al. Involvement of ATM in homologous recombination after end resection and RAD51 nucleofilament
                   formation. Nucleic Acids Res 2015;43:3154-66.
               218. Ahlskog JK, Larsen BD, Achanta K, Sorensen CS. ATM/ATR-mediated phosphorylation of PALB2 promotes RAD51 function. EMBO
                   Rep 2016;17:671-81.
               219. Jackson SP, Helleday T. Drugging DNA repair. Science 2016;352:1178-9.
               220. Glorieux M, Dok R, Nuyts S. Novel DNA targeted therapies for head and neck cancers: clinical potential and biomarkers. Oncotarget
                   2017;8:81662-78.
               221. Riches LC, Trinidad AG, Hughes G, et al. Pharmacology of the ATM inhibitor AZD0156: potentiation of irradiation and olaparib
                   responses preclinically. Mol Cancer Ther 2020;19:13-25.
               222. Zhou C, Parsons JL. The radiobiology of HPV-positive and HPV-negative head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Expert Rev Mol Med
                   2020;22:e3.
               223. Ferri A, Stagni V, Barila D. Targeting the DNA damage response to overcome cancer drug resistance in glioblastoma. Int J Mol Sci
                   2020;21:4910.
               224. Philip CA, Laskov I, Beauchamp MC, et al. Inhibition of PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway sensitizes endometrial cancer cell lines to PARP
                   inhibitors. BMC Cancer 2017;17:638.
               225. Wang D, Li C, Zhang Y, et al. Combined inhibition of PI3K and PARP is effective in the treatment of ovarian cancer cells with wild-type
                   PIK3CA genes. Gynecol Oncol 2016;142:548-56.
               226. Cossar LH, Schache AG, Risk JM, et al. Modulating the DNA damage response to improve treatment response in cervical cancer. Clin
   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91