Page 65 - Read Online
P. 65

Novati et al. Ageing Neur Dis 2022;2:17  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/and.2022.19  Page 19 of 29

               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               Not applicable.


               Consent for publication
               Not applicable.


               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2022.


               REFERENCES
               1.       Modlinska K, Pisula W. The Norway rat, from an obnoxious pest to a laboratory pet. Elife 2020;9:e50651.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               2.       Jacob HJ. The rat: a model used in biomedical research. Methods Mol Biol 2010;597:1-11.  DOI  PubMed
               3.       Hånell A, Marklund N. Structured evaluation of rodent behavioral tests used in drug discovery research. Front Behav Neurosci
                    2014;8:252.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               4.       Kondrakiewicz K, Kostecki M, Szadzińska W, Knapska E. Ecological validity of social interaction tests in rats and mice. Genes
                    Brain Behav 2019;18:e12525.  DOI  PubMed
               5.       Frick KM, Stillner ET, Berger-Sweeney J. Mice are not little rats: species differences in a one-day water maze task. Neuroreport
                    2000;11:3461-5.  DOI  PubMed
               6.       Whishaw I. A comparison of rats and mice in a swimming pool place task and matching to place task: Some surprising differences.
                    Physiology & Behavior 1995;58:687-93.  DOI  PubMed
               7.       Ellenbroek B, Youn J. Rodent models in neuroscience research: is it a rat race? Dis Model Mech 2016;9:1079-87.  DOI  PubMed
                    PMC
               8.       Hok V, Poucet B, Duvelle É, Save É, Sargolini F. Spatial cognition in mice and rats: similarities and differences in brain and
                    behavior. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci 2016;7:406-21.  DOI  PubMed
               9.       D’hooge R, De Deyn PP. Applications of the Morris water maze in the study of learning and memory. Brain Research Reviews
                    2001;36:60-90.  DOI  PubMed
               10.       Stranahan AM. Similarities and differences in spatial learning and object recognition between young male C57Bl/6J mice and
                    Sprague-Dawley rats. Behav Neurosci 2011;125:791-5.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               11.       Whishaw IQ, Tomie J. Of mice and mazes: similarities between mice and rats on dry land but not water mazes. Physiology &
                    Behavior 1996;60:1191-7.  DOI
               12.       Jaramillo S, Zador AM. Mice and rats achieve similar levels of performance in an adaptive decision-making task. Front Syst Neurosci
                    2014;8:173.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               13.       Whishaw IQ, Metz GA, Kolb B, Pellis SM. Accelerated nervous system development contributes to behavioral efficiency in the
                    laboratory mouse: a behavioral review and theoretical proposal. Dev Psychobiol 2001;39:151-70.  DOI  PubMed
               14.       Foote AL, Crystal JD. Metacognition in the rat. Curr Biol 2007;17:551-5.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               15.       Templer VL, Lee KA, Preston AJ. Rats know when they remember: transfer of metacognitive responding across odor-based delayed
                    match-to-sample tests. Anim Cogn 2017;20:891-906.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               16.       Templer VL. Slow progress with the most widely used animal model: ten years of metacognition research in rats, 2009-2019. Anim
                    Behav Cogn 2019;6:273-7.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               17.       Bertrand E, Landeira-Fernandez J, Mograbi DC. Metacognition and perspective-taking in Alzheimer’s disease: a mini-review. Front
                    Psychol 2016;7:1812.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               18.       Netser S, Meyer A, Magalnik H, et al. Distinct dynamics of social motivation drive differential social behavior in laboratory rat and
                    mouse strains. Nat Commun 2020;11:5908.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               19.       Young JW, Jentsch JD, Bussey TJ, Wallace TL, Hutcheson DM. Consideration of species differences in developing novel molecules
                    as cognition enhancers. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2013;37:2181-93.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               20.       Szpirer C. Rat models of human diseases and related phenotypes: a systematic inventory of the causative genes. J Biomed Sci
                    2020;27:84.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               21.       Cunningham ML. A mouse is not a rat is not a human: species differences exist. Toxicol Sci 2002;70:157-8.  DOI
               22.       Waterston RH, Lindblad-Toh K, Birney E, et al; Mouse Genome Sequencing Consortium. Initial sequencing and comparative
                    analysis of the mouse genome. Nature 2002;420:520-62.  DOI  PubMed
               23.       Gibbs RA, Weinstock GM, Metzker ML, et al; Rat Genome Sequencing Project Consortium. Genome sequence of the Brown
                    Norway rat yields insights into mammalian evolution. Nature 2004;428:493-521.  DOI  PubMed
               24.       Chenouard V, Remy S, Tesson L, et al. Advances in genome editing and application to the generation of genetically modified rat
                    models. Front Genet 2021;12:615491.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               25.       Cummings JL, Cole G. Alzheimer disease. JAMA 2002;287:2335-8.  DOI  PubMed
               26.       Antony PM, Diederich NJ, Krüger R, Balling R. The hallmarks of Parkinson’s disease. FEBS J 2013;280:5981-93.  DOI  PubMed
               27.       Macdonald M. A novel gene containing a trinucleotide repeat that is expanded and unstable on Huntington’s disease chromosomes.
   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70