Page 266 - Read Online

Page 14 of 15 Keeney et al. Microstructures 2023;3:2023041 https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/microstructures.2023.41

16. Park BH, Kang BS, Bu SD, Noh TW, Lee J, Jo W. Lanthanum-substituted bismuth titanate for use in non-volatile memories. Nature
1999;401:682-4. DOI
17. Annual report pursuant to section 13 or 15(d) of the securities exchange act of 1934 for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006
commission file number 1 - 6784. Available from: https://www.sec. gov/Archives/edgar/data/63271/000119312506188347/d20f.htm
[Last accessed on 16 Oct 2023].
18. Fujii E, Uchiyama K. First 0.18 μm SBT-based embedded FeRAM technology with hydrogen damage free stacked cell structure.
Integr Ferroelectr 2003;53:317-23. DOI
19. Pitcher MJ, Mandal P, Dyer MS, et al. Magnetic materials. Tilt engineering of spontaneous polarization and magnetization above
300 K in a bulk layered perovskite. Science 2015;347:420-4. DOI
20. Suwardi A, Prasad B, Lee S, et al. Turning antiferromagnetic Sm 0.34 Sr 0.66 MnO into a 140 K ferromagnet using a nanocomposite strain
3
tuning approach. Nanoscale 2016;8:8083-90. DOI
21. Choi EM, Maity T, Kursumovic A, et al. Nanoengineering room temperature ferroelectricity into orthorhombic SmMnO films. Nat
3
Commun 2020;11:2207. DOI PubMed PMC
22. Srihari NV, Vinayakumar KB, Nagaraja KK. Magnetoelectric coupling in bismuth ferrite - challenges and perspectives.
Coatings 2020;10:1221. DOI
23. Keeney L, Maity T, Schmidt M, et al. Magnetic field-induced ferroelectric switching in multiferroic aurivillius phase thin films at
room temperature. J Am Ceram Soc 2013;96:2339-57. DOI
24. Faraz A, Maity T, Schmidt M, et al. Direct visualization of magnetic-field-induced magnetoelectric switching in multiferroic
aurivillius phase thin films. J Am Ceram Soc 2017;100:975-87. DOI
25. Moore K, O'Connell EN, Griffin SM, et al. Charged domain wall and polar vortex topologies in a room-temperature magnetoelectric
multiferroic thin film. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2022;14:5525-36. DOI PubMed PMC
26. Keeney L, Smith RJ, Palizdar M, et al. Ferroelectric behavior in exfoliated 2D aurivillius oxide flakes of sub-unit cell thickness. Adv
Elect Materials 2020;6:1901264. DOI
27. Keeney L, Saghi Z, O’sullivan M, Alaria J, Schmidt M, Colfer L. Persistence of ferroelectricity close to unit-cell thickness in
structurally disordered aurivillius phases. Chem Mater 2020;32:10511-23. DOI
28. Keeney L, Colfer L, Schmidt M. Probing ferroelectric behavior in sub-10 nm bismuth-rich aurivillius films by piezoresponse force
microscopy. Microsc Microanal 2022;28:1396-406. DOI
29. Gradauskaite E, Campanini M, Biswas B, et al. Robust in-plane ferroelectricity in ultrathin epitaxial aurivillius films. Adv Materials
Inter 2020;7:2000202. DOI
30. Gradauskaite E, Gray N, Campanini M, Rossell MD, Trassin M. Nanoscale design of high-quality epitaxial aurivillius thin films. Chem
Mater 2021;33:9439-46. DOI
31. Wang Y, Chen W, Wang B, Zheng Y. Ultrathin ferroelectric films: growth, characterization, physics and applications. Materials
2014;7:6377-485. DOI PubMed PMC
32. Lines ME, Glass AM. Principles and applications of ferroelectrics and related materials. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1977. p.525.
Available from: https://academic.oup.com/book/25990 [Last accessed on 11 Oct 2023].
33. Venables JA, Spiller GDT, Hanbucken M. Nucleation and growth of thin films. Rep Prog Phys 1984;47:399. DOI
34. Binnig G, Quate CF, Gerber C. Atomic force microscope. Phys Rev Lett 1986;56:930-3. DOI PubMed
35. Steffes JJ, Ristau RA, Ramesh R, Huey BD. Thickness scaling of ferroelectricity in BiFeO by tomographic atomic force microscopy.
3
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2019;116:2413-8. DOI PubMed PMC
36. Wang J, Yan Y, Li Z, Geng Y, Luo X, Fan P. Processing outcomes of atomic force microscope tip-based nanomilling with different
trajectories on single-crystal silicon. Precis Eng 2021;72:480-90. DOI
37. Iwata F, Saigo K, Asao T, et al. Removal method of nano-cut debris for photomask repair using an atomic force microscopy system.
Jpn J Appl Phys 2009;48:08JB20. DOI
38. Robinson T, Dinsdale A, Bozak R, White R, Archuletta M. Nanomachining processes for 45, 32 nm mode mask repair and beyond.
Procedings of the Photomask and Next-Generation Lithography Mask Technology XV; 2008 May 19; Yokohama, Japan. DOI
39. Robinson T, Dinsdale A, Bozak R, Arruza B. Advanced mask particle cleaning solutions. Procedings of the SPIE Photomask
Technology; 2007 Oct 30; Monterey, United States. DOI
40. Bartkowska JA, Bochenek D, Niemiec P. Multiferroic aurivillius-type Bi Fe Mn Ti O (0 ≤ x ≤ 1.5) ceramics with negative
3
x
6
2-x
18
dielectric constant. Appl Phys A 2018;124:823. DOI
41. Sader JE, Borgani R, Gibson CT, et al. A virtual instrument to standardise the calibration of atomic force microscope cantilevers. Rev
Sci Instrum 2016;87:093711. DOI
42. Kalinin SV, Rodriguez BJ, Jesse S, et al. Vector piezoresponse force microscopy. Microsc Microanal 2006;12:206-20. DOI
43. Ismunandar, Kamiyama T, Hoshikawa A, et al. Structural studies of five layer Aurivillius oxides: A Bi Ti O (A = Ca, Sr, Ba and Pb).
2 4 5 18
J Solid State Chem 2004;177:4188-96. DOI
44. Holder CF, Schaak RE. Tutorial on powder X-ray diffraction for characterizing nanoscale materials. ACS Nano 2019;13:7359-65.
DOI PubMed
45. Frank FC, van der Merwe JH. One-dimensional dislocations III. Influence of the second harmonic term in the potential representation,
on the properties of the model. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London; 1949 Dec 22; London, UK. London: Royal; pp. 125-34.
46. Trolier-mckinstry S. Crystal chemistry of piezoelectric materials. In: Safari A, Akdoğan EK, editors. Piezoelectric and acoustic
materials for transducer applications. Boston: Springer US; 2008. pp. 39-56. DOI