Page 23 - Read Online
P. 23

Page 8 of 12        Zhang et al. Microstructures 2023;3:2023010  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/microstructures.2022.39

               Table 1. Elastic modulus of CIPS and IPS by CR-AFM
                Properties              Tip Si    HOPG               CIPS              IPS
                1st CRF (kHz)                     653.01 ± 0.25      695.81 ± 0.11     696.15 ± 0.08
                E (GPa)                 160       15                 27.42 ± 0.05      27.51 ± 0.04
                z
                v (Poisson’s ratio)     0.28      0.2                -0.044            0.107

               CIPS: CuInP S ; IPS: In 4/3 2 6
                               P S ; CR-AFM: contact resonance atomic force microscopy; HOPG: highly oriented pyrolytic graphite.
                       2 6
               Table 2. Elastic properties of CIPS and IPS by DFT
                Properties   C  C     C     C     C     C    C     C    C     C     C     C    C    E
                (GPa)      11    22    33    23    13    12   44    55    66   15    25    35   64   z
                CIPS      99.86   101.68   28.02   -3.85   -4.71   25.49   6.99   6.71   37.56   1.93   4.10   2.55   0.91   26.57
                IPS       89.07   75.74   33.27   9.72   10.03   23.12   25.96   11.67   9.90   -6.86   -13.56   3.77   -8.33   27.80

               CIPS: CuInP S ; IPS: In  P S .
                       2 6   4/3 2 6



























                Figure 3. Ferroelectric characterizations of CIPS-IPS crystal. (A and B): a representative topography and phase images. Inset: height
                curve at white section line. (C and F): the PFM phase and amplitude hysteresis loops in P1 (polarization downward) and P2 (polarization
                upward), respectively. (D and E): the enlarged amplitude and phase images in the blue boxed region of (B).

               We also found this common phenomenon in other regions and performed statistical analysis on its area
               distribution, and the results are shown in Supplementary Figure 6. In addition, we measured the
               ferroelectric hysteresis curves of the two domains of CIPS phase, and the results are shown in Figure 3C-F.
               We can clearly see that the phases and amplitudes of both domains exhibit typical characteristics of
               ferroelectric materials. It is worth mentioning that the hysteresis curves of different domains deviate from
               the 0 V, which is mainly caused by the difference in the depolarization fields. Based on the amplitude-
               voltage curves, we calculated the equivalent piezoelectric coefficient d  of the CIPS phase, and the value of
                                                                          33
               d  is about 40.1 ± 2.2 pm/V, as shown in Supplementary Figure 7. The piezoelectric coefficient d  is larger
                                                                                                 33
                33
               than the reported value (ranging from 5 to 12 pm/V) . The local effective d  by the scanning probe
                                                               [29]
                                                                                    33
               technique includes the possible contributions from electrostatic interaction and ionic strain. Similar
               phenomena have been found in ferroelectric materials .
                                                            [44]
   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28