Page 69 - Read Online
P. 69

Morgan et al. Vessel Plus 2020;4:6  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1209.2019.32                                                 Page 11 of 14

               cardiac surgery is not a practical option for many patients with TR, due to the prevalence of comorbid
               conditions; computational modeling allows development and testing of novel devices for percutaneous
               repair, potentially reaching a greater population of patients with TR. Third, and beyond the scope of this
               review, the realm of congenital cardiac surgery involves treatment of patients with a broad spectrum of
               valvular and ventricular disease; the opportunity to model such repairs in-silico prior to operating on an
               individual patient provides for customization of patient-specific repair types with deeper understanding of
               their immediate and long-term mechanical effects.

               DECLARATIONS

               Authors’ contributions
               Primary author, manuscript design, preparation, editing: Morgan AE
               Author of the section “Clinical Impact of TR”: Howell K
               Contributed to the tricuspid anatomy and background sections: Chen S
               Figure designs and original drawings: Serrone RO
               Contributed to cardiac imaging and computational modeling sections: Zheng Y
               Contributed to cardiac imaging and computation modeling sections, figures: Wang VY
               Contributed to echocardiography and imaging sections: Kim JJ
               Contributed to anatomy and background sections, intraoperative images: Grossi E
               Surgical approach and future directions: Selzman CH
               Contributed to modeling section: Guccione JM
               Surgical approach and future directions: Sharma V
               Modeling and future directions: MacLeod R
               Senior author, oversight, editing, figure: Ratcliffe MB


               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.


               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.


               Conflicts of interest
               All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.

               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               Not applicable.


               Consent for publication
               Not applicable.

               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2020.

               REFERENCES
               1.   Topilsky Y, Maltais S, Medina Inojosa J, Oguz D, Michelena H, et al. Burden of tricuspid regurgitation in patients diagnosed in the
                   community setting. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2019;12:433-42.
               2.   Singh JP, Evans JC, Levy D, Larson MG, Freed LA, et al. Prevalence and clinical determinants of mitral, tricuspid, and aortic
                   regurgitation (the framingham heart study). Am J Cardiol 1999;83:897-902.
               3.   Fender EA, Zack CJ, Nishimura RA. Isolated tricuspid regurgitation: outcomes and therapeutic interventions. Heart 2018;104:798-806.
               4.   Nath J, Foster E, Heidenreich PA, Heidenreich PA. Impact of tricuspid regurgitation on long-term survival. J Am Coll Cardiol
                   2004;43:405-9.
   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74