Page 15 - Read Online
P. 15

Qin et al. Vessel Plus 2020;4:2  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1209.2019.22                                                           Page 5 of 8

               Table 2. Markers of infarct size, myocardial reperfusion, and cardiac functions
               Variables                          Pro-UK group (n = 127)  Control group (n = 185)  P-value
               Postoperative TIMI classification [n (%)]                                           0.041
                  0                               1 (0.79%)                2 (1.08%)
                  1                               0 (0.00%)                1 (0.54%)
                  2                               14 (11.02%)              6 (3.24%)
                  3                               112 (88.19%)             176 (95.14%)
               CTFC (mm)                          23.26 ± 2.68             24.16 + 3.65            0.047
               CK peak value (U/L)                2625.50 (1548.75-4582.50)  2356.50 (1203.25-3797.00)  0.032
               CK-MB peak value (U/L)             229.55 (110.60-371.33)   204.30 (96.30-329.65)   0.217
               cTnI peak value (U/L)              9.53 (1.70-25.00)        7.55 (2.29-20.33)       0.511
               ST-segment resolution (> 50%) [n (%)]  87 (68.50%)          139 (75.14%)            0.198
               LVEDd (mm)                         48.08 ± 5.73             47.43 ± 5.26            0.307
               LVEF (%)                           58.28 ± 9.30             58.88 ± 9.03            0.569
               Ventricular aneurysm [n (%)]       14 (11.02%)              10 (5.41%)              0.067
               Ventricular thrombus [n (%)]       1 (0.79%)                2 (1.12%)               0.769
               CK: creatine kinase; CK-MB: creatine kinase isoenzyme-MB; LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction; LVEDd: left ventricular end-diastolic
               diameter; Pro-UK: prourokinase; TIMI: thrombolysis in myocardial infarction; CTFC: corrected TIMI frame count ; cTnI: cardiac troponin I

               Table 3. Comparison of the indexes of severe bleeding events, severe arrhythmia events, and hospitalization days
               Variables                          Pro-UK group (n = 127)  Control group (n = 185)  P-value
               Bleeding events                                                                    0.655
               No                                   117 (92.13%)             172 (92.97%)
               Gastrointestinal bleeding            8 (6.30%)                12 (6.49%)
               Cerebral hemorrhage                  2 (1.57%)                1 (0.54%)
               VT/VF [n (%)]                        14 (11.02%)              10 (5.41%)           0.067
               III° AVB [n (%)]                     12 (9.45%)               7 (3.78%)            0.040
               Hospitalization days (days)          10.00 (8.00-12.00)       9.00 (7.00-11.00)    0.444
               VT/VF: ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation; III° AVB: third-degree atrioventricular block; Pro-UK: prourokinase


               Table 4. Comparison of MACEs between the two groups within one month of surgery
               Variables                          Pro-UK group (n = 127)  Control group (n = 185)  P-value
               Stent thrombosis [n (%)]               0 (0.00%)               1 (0.54%)           0.407
               Angina pectoris [n (%)]                6 (4.72%)               4 (2.16%)           0.207
               Stent rethrombosis [n (%)]             2 (1.57%)               1 (0.54%)           0.358
               Congestive heart failure [n (%)]       32 (25.20%)             38 (20.54%)         0.333
               Cardiac death [n (%)]                  7 (5.51%)               9 (4.86%)           0.799
               MACEs: major adverse cardiovascular events; Pro-UK: prourokinase

               pectoris, stent rethrombosis, congestive heart failure, and cardiac death. There was no significant difference
               in MACEs between the two groups within one month after surgery (P > 0.05; see Table 4).

               Logistic regression analysis
               The MACEs that occurred within one month after surgery in the two groups were used as study Y and
               whether to use rhPro-UK as X, and three logistic regression models were constructed according to the
               different confounding factors. The results of the rough model (without adjusting for any confounding
               factors), the microadjustment model (adjusting for only age and sex), and the overall adjustment model
               (adjusting for sex, age, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, smoking, number of stents implanted,
               number of balloons used, Killip, post-PCI TIMI classification, time from symptom onset to balloon
               dilatation, and time from admission to balloon dilatation) show that the use of rhPro-UK was not
               significantly associated with the risk of MACEs (P > 0.05; see Table 5).
   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20