Page 51 - Read Online
P. 51

D’Abramo et al. Vessel Plus 2019;3:4  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1209.2018.41                                                 Page 7 of 7

               5.   Cribier A. Commemorating the 15-year anniversary of TAVI: insights into the early stages of development, from concept to human
                   application, and perspectives. EuroIntervention 2017;13:29-37.
               6.   Gatto L, Biondi-Zoccai G, Romagnoli E, Frati G, Prati F, et al. New-generation devices for transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
                   Minerva Cardioangiol 2018;66:747-61.
               7.   Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack MJ, Makkar RR, Svensson LG, et al. Transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement in intermediate-risk
                   patients. N Eng J Med 2016;374:1609-20.
               8.   Baumgartner H, Falk V, Bax JJ, De Bonis M, Hamm C, et al. 2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart
                   disease. Eur Heart J 2017;38:2739-91.
               9.   Chirichilli I, D’Ascoli R, Rose D, Frati G, Greco E. Port Access (Thru-Port System) video-assisted mitral valve surgery. J Thorac Dis
                   2013;5 Suppl 6:S680-5.
               10.  Biondi-Zoccai G, Mancone M, Frati G. Our preoccupation with renal artery disease in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: much ado
                   about nothing? J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;63:317-20.
               11.  Hamm CW, Arsalan M, Mack MJ. The future of transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Eur Heart J 2016;37:803-10.
               12.  Ando T, Takagi H, Grines CL. Transfemoral, transapical and transcatheter aortic valve implantation and surgica aortic valve
                   replacement: a meta analysis f direct and adjusted indirect comparisons of early and mid term deaths. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg
                   2017;25:484-92.
               13.  Biondi-Zoccai G, Peruzzi M, Abbate A, Gertz ZM, Benedetto U, et al. Network meta-analysis on the comparative effectiveness and
                   safety of transcatheter aortic valve implantation with CoreValve or Sapien devices versus surgical replacement. Heart Lung Vessel
                   2014;6:232-43.
               14.  Takagi H, Ando T, Umemoto T; ALICE (All-Literature Investigation of Cardiovascular Evidence) Group. A meta-analysis of effects of
                   transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement on left ventricualr ejection fraction and mass. Int J Cardiol 2017;238:31-6.
               15.  Witberg G, Lador A, Yahav D, Kornowski R. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients at low surgical risk: a
                   meta-analysis of randomized trials and propensity score matched observational studies. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2018;92:408-16.
               16.  Leipsic J, Bax JJ, Webb JG, Martin R, Blanke P. Trials testing the value of imaging use in valve disease and in transcatheter valvular
                   interventions. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2017;10:286-95.
               17.  Tam DY, Hughes A, Fremes SE, Youn S, Hancock-Howard RL, et al. A cost-utility analysis of transcatheter versus surgical
                   aorticvalve replacement for the treatment of aortic stenosis in the population with intermediate surgical risk. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
                   2018;155:1978-88.
               18.  Villablanca PA, Mathew V, Thourani VH, Rodés-Cabau J, Bangalore S, et al. A meta-analysis and meta-regression of long-term
                   outcomes of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis. Int J Cardiol 2016;225:234-43.
               19.  Rahmanian PB, Kaya S, Eghbalzadeh K, Menghesha H, Madershahian N, et al. Rapid deployment aortic valve replacement: excellent
                   results and increased effective orifice areas. Ann Thorac Surg 2018;105:24-30.
               20.  Hurley ET, O’Sullivan KE, Segurado R, Hurley JP. A meta-analysis examining differences in short-term outcomes between sutureless
                   and conventional aortic valve prostheses. Innovations (Phila) 2015;10:375-82.
               21.  Ferrari E, Roduit C, Salamin P, Caporali E, Demertzis S, et al. Rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement versus standard bioprosthesis
                   implantation. J Card Surg 2017;32:322-7.
               22.  Ensminger S, Fujita B, Bauer T, Möllmann H, Beckmann A, et al. Rapid deployment versus conventional bioprosthetic valve
                   replacement for aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018;71:1417-28.
               23.  Meco M, Miceli A, Montisci A, Donatelli F, Cirri S, et al. Sutureless aortic valve replacement versus transcatheter aortic valve
                   implantation: a meta-analysis of comparative matched studies using propensity score matching. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg
                   2018;26:202-9.
               24.  Shinn SH, Altarabsheh SE, Deo SV, Sabik JH, Markowitz AH, et al. A systematic review and meta analysis of suturless aortic valve
                   replacement versus transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Ann Thorac Surg 2018;106:924-9
               25.  Takagi H, Ando T, Umemoto T; ALICE (All-Literature Investigation of Cardiovascular Evidence) Group. Direct and adjusted indirect
                   comparisons of perioperative mortality after sutureless or rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement versus transcatheter aortic valve
                   implantation. Int J Cardiol 2017;228:327-34.
               26.  D’Onofrio A, Salizzoni S, Rubino AS, Besola L, Filippini C, et al. The rise of new technologies for aortic valve stenosis: a comparison
                   of sutureless and transcatheter aortic valve implantation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016;152:99-109.
   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56