Page 56 - Read Online
P. 56

Sazonova et al. Vessel Plus 2019;3:5  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1209.2018.56                                                 Page 5 of 9

                                        Table 3. Annealing temperature for the PCR [24,26,28-30]
                                         Mutations   Annealing temperature for primers
                                         m.15059G>A
                                         m.3336T>C
                                         m.13513G>A            55 °C
                                         m.3256C>T
                                         m.14846G>A
                                         m.652insG

                                         m.5178C>A             60°C
                                         m.652delG
                                         m.14459G>A
                                         m.1555A>G             50 °C
                                         m.12315G>A

               CCCATAAACAAATA (639-651);
               2. For m.5178C>A
               ATTAAGGGTGTTAGTCATGT (5200-5181);
               3. For m.3336T>C
               TGCGATTAGAATGGGTAC (3354-3337);
               4. For m.14459G>A
               GATACTCCTCAATAGCCA (14439-14456);
               5. For m.652delG
               CCCATAAACAAATA (639-651);
               6. For m.14846G>A
               GCGCCAAGGAGTGA (14861-14848);
               7. For m.1555A>G
               ACGCATTTATATAGAGGA (1537-1554);
               8. For m.15059G>A
               TTTCTGAGTAGAGAAATGAT (15080-15061);
               9. For m.3256C>T
               AAGAAGAGGAATTGA (3300-3286);
               4. For m.12315G>A
               TTTGGAGTTGCAC (12328-12316);
               8. For m.13513G>A
               AGGTTTCTACTCCAA (13497-13511).

               The heteroplasmy level of mtDNA mutations was analyzed using a quantitative method developed on the
               basis of pyrosequencing technology by our laboratory [24-26,38,39] . The statistical analysis was performed using
                                       [40]
               SPSS 22.0 software package . The bootstrap analysis and the Spearman correlation coefficient were used.
               The results were considered statistically significant at P ≤ 0.05. In addition, the results were taken into
               account, the significance level of which was P ≤ 0.1. It was supposed that such results had a tendency to have
               statistical significance. They may be significant if the sample is expanded.


               RESULTS
               According to Table 1, statistically significant differences by clinical and anthropometric characteristics
               between samples of patients with left ventricular hypertrophy and conventionally healthy study participants
               were not found.


               It should be noted that the age of patients with left ventricular hypertrophy ranged from 53 to 75 years.
               At the same time, the age of conventionally healthy participants ranged from 54 to 62 years [Table 2]. The
               mean age of patients with left ventricular hypertrophy was 6 years higher than the age of conventionally
               healthy study participants. This age difference between samples of patients with left ventricular hypertrophy
   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61