Page 387 - Read Online
P. 387

Page 10 of 11                                                  Elsayed et al. Vessel Plus 2018;2:39  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1209.2018.65

               Endarterectomy leaves behind a coronary vessel denuded of endothelium. This bare area acts as a nidus
               for thrombus formation and triggers a rapid coagulation cascade in the early postoperative period and can
               explain the high rate of postoperative MI. Therefore it seems obvious that thromboprophylaxis serves as
               a cornerstone in the outcome of those patients. Nevertheless anticoagulation regimens followed are based
               on surgeon’s experience. This is due to lack of randomized controlled studies and the fact that there are no
               recommendations on anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy in endarterectomy patients published in the
               guidelines yet.

                                           [3]
               In a recent review by Soylu et al.  perioperative MI ranged from 0 to 19 percent, cerebrovascular accident
               ranged from 0 to 6 percent and the operative mortality ranged from 0 to 19 percent. Coronary endarterectomy
               was accompanied by acceptable patency rates, that ranged from 56% to 100% at a post-operative follow-up
               ranging from 6 months to 10 years. Our results match the results of large series in the literature.

               In the current era, coronary endarterectomy appears as a valuable surgical option in diffusely diseased
               coronary vessels. With appropriate indications and in experienced hands, it can be done with acceptable
               morbidity, mortality, angiographic patency rates and lead to favorable outcomes in a high risk cohort.

               In conclusion, results of reconstruction by LIMA and saphenous vein patch are comparable in short term
               follow up.


               DECLARATIONS
               Acknowledgments
               Dr. Bassem Ramadan for sharing his expertise in coronary reconstruction.


               Authors’ contributions
               Collection of data, analysis, follow up of patients, writing up the manuscript: Elsayed MH
               Design of the study and revision, operated most of the cases: Hassanein WM
               Revision of the manuscript: Keshk SA, Etman WG
               Follow up of cases: Zidan M

               Availability of data and materials
               Alexandria University Cardiothoracic Surgery Department database.


               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.

               Conflicts of interest
               All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.

               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               Informed consents were obtained from all patients prior to the procedure with explanation regarding
               the aim of the procedure and the possible side effects according to the guidelines of ethical committee at
               Alexandria Faculty of Medicine.


               Consent for publication
               Not applicable.

               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2018.
   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390   391   392