Page 61 - Read Online

Ashenhurst et al. Vessel Plus 2024;8:3 https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1209.2023.90 Page 15 of 15

38. Sherazee EA, Chen SA, Li D, Li D, Frank P, Kiaii B. Pain management strategies for minimally invasive cardiothoracic surgery.
Innovations 2022;17:167-76. DOI
39. Karmakar MK, Ho AM. Postthoracotomy pain syndrome. Thorac Surg Clin 2004;14:345-52. DOI PubMed
40. Guo MH, Wells GA, Glineur D, et al. Minimally Invasive coronary surgery compared to STernotomy coronary artery bypass grafting:
the MIST trial. Contemp Clin Trials 2019;78:140-5. DOI
41. Liang L, Liu JJ, Kong QY, et al. Comparison of early outcomes associated with coronary artery bypass grafting for multi-vessel
disease conducted using minimally invasive or conventional off-pump techniques: a propensity-matched study based on SYNTAX
score. J Cardiothorac Surg 2022;17:144. DOI PubMed PMC
42. Liang L, Ma X, Kong Q, et al. Comparing patient outcomes following minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting surgery vs.
coronary artery bypass grafting: a single-center retrospective cohort study. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 2022;12:378-88. DOI PubMed
PMC
43. Baishya J, George A, Krishnamoorthy J, Muniraju G, Chakravarthy M. Minimally invasive compared to conventional approach for
coronary artery bypass grafting improves outcome. Ann Card Anaesth 2017;20:57-60. DOI PubMed PMC
44. McGinn JT, Shariff M, Lapierre H, Sohmer B, Goyal N, Ruel M. Abstract 18959: minimally invasive CABG: results to 6 years.
Circulation 2012;126:A18959. Available from: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/abs/10.1161/circ.126.suppl_21.a18959 [Last accessed
on 10 Jan 2024]
45. Ruel M, Shariff M, Lapierre H, Sohmer B, Mcginn J. 254 mid-term results of 800 minimally invasive coronary bypass operations. Can
J Cardiol 2012;28:S186. DOI
46. Akowuah EF, Maier RH, Hancock HC, et al. Minithoracotomy vs conventional sternotomy for mitral valve repair: a randomized
clinical trial. JAMA 2023;329:1957-66. DOI
47. Issa HMN, Ruel M. Beating heart multi-vessel minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting: techniques and pitfalls. J Vis
Surg 2023;9:5. DOI
48. Ruel M. Commentary: sternotomy for every cardiac surgery patient ain’t the future, so let’s get going. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
2023;165:129-31. DOI
49. Qureshi SH, Ruel M. The 7 pillars of multivessel minimally invasive coronary surgery. Innovations 2021;16:216-7. DOI PubMed
PMC
50. Gaudino M, Angelini GD, Antoniades C, et al. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: 30 years of debate. J Am Heart Assoc
2018;7:e009934. DOI PubMed PMC
51. Shaefi S, Mittel A, Loberman D, Ramakrishna H. Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting-a systematic review and
analysis of clinical outcomes. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2019;33:232-44. DOI PubMed
52. Ivanov J, Borger MA, Tu JV, Rao V, David TE. Mid-term outcomes of off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass graft
surgery. Can J Cardiol 2008;24:279-84. DOI PubMed PMC
53. Yang L, Lin S, Zhang H, et al. Long-term graft patency after off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass: a coronary trial cohort.
Ann Thorac Surg 2020;110:2055-61. DOI
54. Benedetto U, Lau C, Caputo M, et al. Comparison of outcomes for off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in low-
volume and high-volume centers and by low-volume and high-volume surgeons. Am J Cardiol 2018;121:552-7. DOI
55. Kuss O, von Salviati B, Börgermann J. Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review and meta-
analysis of propensity score analyses. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010;140:829-35, 835.e1-13. DOI PubMed
56. Une D, Lapierre H, Sohmer B, Rai V, Ruel M. Can minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting be initiated and practiced
safely? Learning curve of small thoracotomy CABG. Can J Cardiol 2013;29:S250-1. DOI
57. Rodriguez ML, Lapierre HR, Sohmer B, Ruel JP, Ruel MA. Predictors and outcomes of sternotomy conversion and cardiopulmonary
bypass assistance in minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting. Innovations 2016;11:315-20. DOI PubMed
58. Rodriguez ML, Lapierre HR, Sohmer B, Glineur D, Ruel M. Mid-term follow-up of minimally invasive multivessel coronary artery
bypass grafting: is the early learning phase detrimental? Innovations 2017;12:116-20. DOI PubMed
59. Andrawes PA, Shariff MA, Nabagiez JP, et al. Evolution of minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting: learning curve.
Innovations 2018;13:81-90. DOI
60. Brown PP, Kugelmass AD, Cohen DJ, et al. The frequency and cost of complications associated with coronary artery bypass grafting
surgery: results from the United States Medicare program. Ann Thorac Surg 2008;85:1980-6. DOI
61. Chen JC, Kaul P, Levy JH, et al. Myocardial infarction following coronary artery bypass graft surgery increases healthcare resource
utilization. Crit Care Med 2007;35:1296-301. DOI
62. Teman NR, Hawkins RB, Charles EJ, et al. Minimally invasive vs open coronary surgery: a multi-institutional analysis of cost and
outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg 2021;111:1478-84. DOI
63. Jahangiri M, Mani K, Nowell J. Does minimally invasive coronary artery surgery have prognostic and cost benefits? Ann Thorac Surg
2022;114:609-10. DOI PubMed
64. Ponnambalam M, Alex RM. Preoperative optimization and rapid discharge after coronary artery bypass grafting. Curr Opin Cardiol
2023;38:471-7. DOI PubMed
65. Guo MH, Vo TX, Horsthuis K, et al. Durability of minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting. J Am Coll Cardiol
2021;78:1390-1. DOI