Page 201 - Read Online
P. 201

Harik et al. Vessel Plus 2023;7:30  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1209.2023.124  Page 13 of 16

               Consent for publication
               Not applicable.


               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2023.


               REFERENCES
               1.       Harik L, Sandner S, Gaudino M. Unanswered questions on coronary artery graft patency and clinical outcomes. Curr Opin Cardiol
                    2023;38:441-6.  DOI  PubMed
               2.       Gaudino M, Antoniades C, Benedetto U, et al. Mechanisms, consequences, and prevention of coronary graft failure. Circulation
                    2017;136:1749-64.  DOI
               3.       Lawton JS, Tamis-Holland JE, Bangalore S, et al. 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI guideline for coronary artery revascularization: executive
                    summary: a report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association joint committee on clinical practice guidelines.
                    Circulation 2022;145:e4-17.  DOI
               4.       Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, et al. 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J
                    2019;40:87-165.  DOI
               5.       Chan J, Dimagli A, Dong T, Fudulu DP, Sinha S, Angelini GD. Trend and factors associated with multiple arterial revascularization
                    in coronary artery bypass grafting in the UK. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2022;62:ezac284.  DOI  PubMed
               6.       Schwann TA, Habib RH, Wallace A, et al. Operative outcomes of multiple-arterial versus single-arterial coronary bypass grafting.
                    Ann Thorac Surg 2018;105:1109-19.  DOI
               7.       Taggart DP, Altman DG, Gray AM, et al. Randomized trial of bilateral versus single internal-thoracic-artery grafts. N Engl J Med
                    2016;375:2540-9.  DOI
               8.       Lazar HL. The risk of mediastinitis and deep sternal wound infections with single and bilateral, pedicled and skeletonized internal
                    thoracic arteries. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2018;7:663-72.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               9.       Caliskan E, de Souza DR, Böning A, et al. Saphenous vein grafts in contemporary coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Nat Rev
                    Cardiol 2020;17:155-69.  DOI
               10.       Dimagli A, Soletti G Jr, Harik L, et al. Angiographic outcomes for arterial and venous conduits used in CABG. J Clin Med
                    2023;12:2022.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               11.       Gaudino M, Benedetto U, Fremes SE, et al. Angiographic outcome of coronary artery bypass grafts: the radial artery database
                    international alliance. Ann Thorac Surg 2020;109:688-94.  DOI
               12.       Deng MX, Lia H, Lee G, et al. Angiographic patency of coronary artery bypass conduits: an updated network meta-analysis of
                    randomized trials. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg 2022;37:7-31.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               13.       Buxton BF, Hayward PA, Raman J, et al. Long-term results of the RAPCO trials. Circulation 2020;142:1330-8.  DOI
               14.       Gaudino M, Di Franco A, Bhatt DL, et al. The association between coronary graft patency and clinical status in patients with
                    coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 2021;42:1433-41.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               15.       Gaudino M, Sandner S, An KR, et al. Graft failure after coronary artery bypass grafting and its association with patient characteristics
                    and clinical events: a pooled individual patient data analysis of clinical trials with imaging follow-up. Circulation 2023;148:1305-15.
                    DOI
               16.       Glineur D, Grau JB, Etienne PY, et al. Impact of preoperative fractional flow reserve on arterial bypass graft anastomotic function:
                    the IMPAG trial. Eur Heart J 2019;40:2421-8.  DOI
               17.       Harskamp RE, Alexander JH, Ferguson TB Jr, et al. Frequency and predictors of internal mammary artery graft failure and
                    subsequent clinical outcomes: insights from the project of ex-vivo vein graft engineering via transfection (PREVENT) IV trial.
                    Circulation 2016;133:131-8.  DOI
               18.       Hamilton GW, Raman J, Moten S, et al. Radial artery vs. internal thoracic artery or saphenous vein grafts: 15-year results of the
                    RAPCO trials. Eur Heart J 2023;44:2406-8.  DOI  PubMed
               19.       Gaudino M, Benedetto U, Fremes S, et al. Association of radial artery graft vs saphenous vein graft with long-term cardiovascular
                    outcomes among patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2020;324:179-
                    87.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               20.       Taggart DP, Benedetto U, Gerry S, et al. Bilateral versus single internal-thoracic-artery grafts at 10 years. N Engl J Med
                    2019;380:437-46.  DOI
               21.       Harskamp RE, Lopes RD, Baisden CE, de Winter RJ, Alexander JH. Saphenous vein graft failure after coronary artery bypass
                    surgery: pathophysiology, management, and future directions. Ann Surg 2013;257:824-33.  DOI  PubMed
               22.       Angelini GD, Passani SL, Breckenridge IM, Newby AC. Nature and pressure dependence of damage induced by distension of human
                    saphenous vein coronary artery bypass grafts. Cardiovasc Res 1987;21:902-7.  DOI  PubMed
               23.       Souza D. A new no-touch preparation technique. Technical notes. Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;30:41-4.  DOI
               24.       Souza DS, Johansson B, Bojö L, et al. Harvesting the saphenous vein with surrounding tissue for CABG provides long-term graft
                    patency comparable to the left internal thoracic artery: results of a randomized longitudinal trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206