Page 204 - Read Online

Page 16 of 16 Harik et al. Vessel Plus 2023;7:30 https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1209.2023.124

81. Glineur D, Hanet C, Poncelet A, et al. Comparison of bilateral internal thoracic artery revascularization using in situ or Y graft
configurations: a prospective randomized clinical, functional, and angiographic midterm evaluation. Circulation 2008;118:S216-21.
DOI PubMed
82. Glineur D, Boodhwani M, Hanet C, et al. Bilateral internal thoracic artery configuration for coronary artery bypass surgery: a
prospective randomized trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2016;9:e003518. DOI PubMed PMC
83. Parissis H, Ramesh BC, Al-Alao B. Off-pump coronary surgery: current justifications. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014;62:660-70.
DOI PubMed
84. Sousa Uva M, Cavaco S, Oliveira AG, et al. Early graft patency after off-pump and on-pump coronary bypass surgery: a prospective
randomized study. Eur Heart J 2010;31:2492-9. DOI
85. Houlind K, Fenger-Grøn M, Holme SJ, et al. Graft patency after off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery is inferior even with
identical heparinization protocols: results from the Danish on-pump versus off-pump randomization study (DOORS). J Thorac
Cardiovasc Surg 2014;148:1812-9.e2. DOI
86. Hattler B, Messenger JC, Shroyer AL, et al. Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery is associated with worse arterial and saphenous
vein graft patency and less effective revascularization: results from the Veterans affairs randomized on/off bypass (ROOBY) trial.
Circulation 2012;125:2827-35. DOI
87. Noiseux N, Stevens LM, Chartrand-Lefebvre C, et al. Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: graft patency
assessment with coronary computed tomographic angiography: a prospective multicenter randomized controlled pilot study. J Thorac
Imaging 2017;32:370-7. DOI
88. Zhou Z, Fu G, Feng K, et al. Randomized evidence on graft patency after off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting:
an updated meta-analysis. Int J Surg 2022;98:106212. DOI
89. Björklund E, Nielsen SJ, Hansson EC, et al. Secondary prevention medications after coronary artery bypass grafting and long-term
survival: a population-based longitudinal study from the SWEDEHEART registry. Eur Heart J 2020;41:1653-61. DOI PubMed
PMC
90. Kurlansky P, Herbert M, Prince S, Mack M. Coronary artery bypass graft versus percutaneous coronary intervention: meds matter:
impact of adherence to medical therapy on comparative outcomes. Circulation 2016;134:1238-46. DOI
91. Pan E, Nielsen SJ, Mennander A, et al. Statins for secondary prevention and major adverse events after coronary artery bypass
grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2022;164:1875-86.e4. DOI
92. Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Trial Investigators. The effect of aggressive lowering of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and
low-dose anticoagulation on obstructive changes in saphenous-vein coronary-artery bypass grafts. N Engl J Med 1997;336:153-62.
DOI PubMed
93. Kulik A, Abreu AM, Boronat V, Ruel M. Intensive versus moderate statin therapy and early graft occlusion after coronary bypass
surgery: the aggressive cholesterol therapy to inhibit vein graft events randomized clinical trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
2019;157:151-61.e1. DOI PubMed
94. Gaudino M, Chadow D, Rahouma M, et al. Operative outcomes of women undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery in the US,
2011 to 2020. JAMA Surg 2023;158:494-502. DOI PubMed PMC
95. Alam M, Lee VV, Elayda MA, et al. Association of gender with morbidity and mortality after isolated coronary artery bypass
grafting. A propensity score matched analysis. Int J Cardiol 2013;167:180-4. DOI
96. Attia T, Koch CG, Houghtaling PL, Blackstone EH, Sabik EM, Sabik JF 3rd. Does a similar procedure result in similar survival for
women and men undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2017;153:571-9.e9. DOI PubMed
97. Jawitz OK, Lawton JS, Thibault D, et al. Sex differences in coronary artery bypass grafting techniques: a society of thoracic surgeons
database analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 2022;113:1979-88. DOI
98. Rubens FD, Wells GA, Coutinho T, Eddeen AB, Sun LY. Sex differences after coronary artery bypass grafting with a second arterial
conduit. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2022;163:686-95.e10. DOI
99. Gaudino M, Samadashvili Z, Hameed I, Chikwe J, Girardi LN, Hannan EL. Differences in long-term outcomes after coronary artery
bypass grafting using single vs multiple arterial grafts and the association with sex. JAMA Cardiol 2020;6:401-9. DOI PubMed
PMC
100. Gaudino M, Bairey Merz CN, Sandner S, et al. Randomized comparison of the outcome of single versus multiple arterial grafts trial
(ROMA):women-a trial dedicated to women to improve coronary bypass outcomes. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2023:S0022-
5223(23)00525. Online ahead of print DOI
101. Gaudino M, Fremes SE, Mehran R, Bairey Merz CN, ROMA:Women Steering Committee and Investigators. ROMA:women:
innovative approaches for the first cardiac surgery trial in women. Circulation 2023;148:1289-91. DOI
102. Vrancic JM, Navia DO, Espinoza JC, et al. Is sex a risk factor for death in patients with bilateral internal thoracic artery grafts? J
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2019;158:1345-53.e1. DOI
103. Gaudino M, Di Mauro M, Fremes SE, Di Franco A. Representation of women in randomized trials in cardiac surgery: a meta-
analysis. J Am Heart Assoc 2021;10:e020513. DOI PubMed PMC
104. Lehtinen ML, Harik L, Soletti G, et al. Sex differences in saphenous vein graft patency: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J
Card Surg 2022;37:4573-8. DOI PubMed PMC
105. Markman PL, Rowland MA, Leong JY, et al. Skeletonized internal thoracic artery harvesting reduces chest wall dysesthesia after
coronary bypass surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010;139:674-9. DOI PubMed