Page 192 - Read Online
P. 192

Page 4 of 16                   Harik et al. Vessel Plus 2023;7:30  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1209.2023.124

               Table 1. The relationship between graft failure and clinical events. A recent individual patient data meta-analysis by Gaudino et al.
               included seven CABG trials with per-protocol imaging and assessed the relationship betweeen graft failure and clinical outcomes up
               until first imaging assessment (median timepoint of 1.02 years) and at all later timepoints [15]
                                        All grafts    Graft failure   No graft failure   Adjusted odds ratio
                Timepoint                                                                             I 2
                                        (n = 4,413), %  (n = 1,487), %  (n = 2,926), %  (95%CI)
                Before imaging                                                                        0%
                MI or repeat revascularization   167 (3.8)  118 (8.0)  49 (1.7)    3.98 (3.54-4.47)   0%
                MI                      58 (1.3)      35 (2.3)      23 (0.8)       3.54 (1.78-7.01)   0%
                Repeat revascularization  138 (3.1)   105 (7.1)     33 (1.1)       5.02 (3.23-7.82)
                After imaging
                MI or repeat revascularization   244 (5.5)  170 (11.4)  74 (2.5)   3.46 (1.44-8.34)   43%
                MI                      28 (0.6)      16 (1.1)      12 (0.4)       1.45 (0.67-3.14)   0%
                Repeat revascularization  234 (5.3)   164 (11.0)    70 (2.4)       3.80 (1.24-10.83)  51%
                Anytime
                MI or repeat revascularization   411 (9.3)  288 (19.4)  123 (4.2)  3.47 (2.43-4.95)   15%
                MI                      86 (1.9)      51 (3.4)      35 (1.2)       2.57 (1.56-4.25)   0%
                Repeat revascularization  372 (8.4)   269 (18.1)    103 (3.5)      4.25 (2.31-7.80)   35%
                All-cause mortality     223 (5.1)     163 (11.0)    60 (2.1)       2.79 (2.01-3.89)   0%
                                                                [15]
               CI: Confidence interval; MI: myocardial infarction. Adapted from Gaudino et al.  .


               CLINICAL OUTCOMES WITH DIFFERENT CABG GRAFTS
               Contemporary RCTs and meta-analyses have also compared the clinical outcomes of CABG by the type of
               graft used. Utilization of the RA has been associated with excellent clinical outcomes. Results were recently
               reported from 15-year follow-up of RAPCO, which reported the incidence of the primary outcome of the
               composite of mortality, myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularization was lower for the RA compared
               to RITA (39.4% vs. 48.5%, HR 0.74, 95%CI: 0.55-0.97; P = 0.04) and for the RA compared to SVG (69.2% vs.
               73.2%, HR 0.71, 95%CI: 0.52-0.98; P = 0.04) . An individual patient data meta-analysis from the RADIAL
                                                    [18]
                                                               [19]
               database including five CABG RCTs and 1,036 patients  found that when compared with the use of the
               SVG, at 10 years, there was an association between the use of the RA and significantly lower incidence of
               both the composite of death, MI, or repeat revascularization (HR 0.73, 95%CI: 0.61-0.88; P < 0.001) and with
               a lower incidence of the composite of death or myocardial infarction (HR 0.77, 95%CI: 0.63-0.94; P = 0.01).

               The Arterial Revascularization Trial (ART) was a large, multicenter RCT investigating the outcomes of
               3,102 CABG in patients randomized to either single ITA or bilateral ITA grafting. At 10-year follow-up,
               there was no difference in mortality between patients receiving bilateral ITA grafting (20.3%) and single ITA
               grafting (21.2%, HR 0.96, 95%CI: 0.82-1.12; P = 0.62). There was also no difference between groups in the
               composite  outcome  of  mortality,  myocardial  infarction,  or  stroke  (24.9%  vs. 27.3%,  HR  0.90,
               95%CI: 0.79-1.03) . This study had notable limitations, including a 13.9% crossover from bilateral ITA
                              [20]
               grafting to single ITA grafting, as well as a lack of pre-defined study criteria for the use of the second arterial
               conduit, such that 21.8% of the patients in the single ITA group receiving RA grafting. More data on clinical
               outcomes of CABG with MAG, with the RA and RITA as second arterial grafts, will be provided by the
               randomized comparison of the clinical outcome of single vs. multiple arterial grafts (ROMA) trial (NCT
               03217006).


               CONSIDERATIONS FOR USE OF THE SVG
               Harvesting technique
               Early graft failure secondary to acute thrombosis is predominantly observed in vein grafts rather than
   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197