Page 39 - Read Online
P. 39

Page 12 of 14         Bros-Facer et al. Rare Dis Orphan Drugs J 2023;2:21  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/rdodj.2023.26

                                                        [35]
               system [6,8,9]  and can be cost-neutral or cost-saving . Thus, it is reasonable to suggest that early identification
               of treatable conditions with NGS-based NBS will also have long-term and potentially cost-saving impacts.

               A rapid turnaround time from sampling to report is not a priority for most respondents, who would rather
               gradually decrease the time-to-result while avoiding compromising more essential aspects such as quality
               control and confirmatory testing. However, if the long-term goal is to implement NBS that is timely enough
               for effective intervention, turnaround time is an important component as well as minimal disruption to
               current NBS programs.


               Besides technical feasibility, several challenges linked to NGS implementation in a screening and public
               health program are shared between countries and initiatives. Those highlighted by survey responses include
               the development of accessible clinical care pathways for all screened diseases, ethical challenges related to
               autonomy, information and consent, long-term storage of genomic data, and integration or linkage to
               medical records. While a discussion of legal, ethical, and privacy concerns is critical when considering the
               use of genomic information in NBS programs, they were out of scope for the present study which was
               primarily focused on providing an assessment of planned and ongoing NGS-based NBS programs in
               Europe.


               The survey also revealed an interest in engaging with relevant stakeholders and a recognition that
               engagement, awareness, and education are necessary components of implementation. However, plans for
               these activities were not well developed in all studies. Building the capacity of the workforce including
               laboratory technicians, specialized physicians, midwives, and nurses with varying degrees of involvement in
               NBS will be key to meeting the increased demands for clinical services downstream of expanded NGS-based
               NBS programs. Compromising uptake of current NBS programs by the introduction of genomic testing is a
               concern shared by many. Fostering public trust through engagement as well as education and information
               of the public are key elements to ensure that uptake of current NBS programs will not be compromised by
                                                    [36]
               the introduction of genomic screening tests . The development of preference studies to better understand
               conditions for the acceptability of genomic screening will help inform an optimal implementation of novel
               technologies alongside traditional and existing NBS programs.

               In conclusion, there are many initiatives being developed in Europe that will explore the utility and
               feasibility of NGS approaches in NBS programs. This descriptive survey of current programs ongoing or in
               planning across Europe is an opportunity to survey the landscape, share knowledge and experiences, and
               reflect on the path towards future implementation. While the projects are heterogeneous in design and
               maturity, each has the opportunity to contribute information that will enable responsible implementation of
               NGS in NBS, helping to identify what additional evidence is needed for adoption and informing future
               research. Confirmatory testing, follow-up protocols of the newborns, conditions for public acceptability,
               and tracking of downstream healthcare costs are all elements that would benefit from a more unified
               approach across initiatives. Considering the low prevalence of rare diseases and the small datasets generated
               by current pilots, sharing data across initiatives will be critical to provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate
               the clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of NGS in NBS and to consider future implementation within the
               national healthcare systems and public health programs. We hope that this overview of European NGS-
               based NBS initiatives will encourage communication and collaboration across countries, in Europe and
               beyond, avoiding duplication of effort, identifying priorities for resource allocation, and leading to
               consensus messaging for the expansion of NBS programs around the world.
   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44