Page 826 - Read Online
P. 826

Page 2 of 14                           Mirastschijski et al. Plast Aesthet Res 2020;7:70  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2020.147

               Conclusion: The embryological origins of genital skin fibroblasts, together with the gender-specific hormonal
               environment, contribute to the unique phenotype and healing properties of genital skin. When performing genital
               surgery, it is of utmost importance to be aware of the differing responsiveness of genital tissue to trauma, surgery,
               and repair.

               Keywords: Genital skin, hormone sensitivity, shrinkage, scarless, oestrogen, testosterone





               INTRODUCTION
               The skin is our largest organ, consisting of a variety of cells, layers, adnexa such as hair follicles, sebaceous
               and sweat glands, and with nerve endings sensing pain, pressure, vibrations and temperature. All these
               entities act in concert to sense and to protect us against the outside world, e.g., physical, chemical and
               biological influences (temperature, radiation, desiccation, trauma, chemicals, microbia, etc.). Furthermore,
               the skin is of utmost importance for us to perceive our environment and for communication. Our skeleton
               and the musculature provide the inner framework, which the skin covers as outer surface. The elasticity
               and robustness of the skin are optimized for growth, joint motion and shear and tear.

               As stated above, the integrity of our outer envelope is the prerequisite for survival. A whole body of
               literature and knowledge is available on the physiology of skin wound healing and scarring as summarized
               in this PAR issue. Interestingly, little is known on the anatomical features and pathophysiology of genital
                                                                                                        [1]
               wound repair. This may be due to the fact that trauma to the genitalia is rare with only 5.3% of combat
                                    [2]
               or 1.5% of burn injuries  afflicting the genital area. In contrast, infections are quite common. With the
               commensal microbial colonization of the vagina, urinary orifices or anus, the genital skin is constantly
               exposed to a high variety of putative intruders. Minor lesions can cause bacterial penetration into deeper
               tissue layers and manifest as abscess, gangrene or fasciitis, also known as Fournier’s gangrene with a
                            [3]
               high mortality . Due to the life-threatening character of genital infections, immediate and thorough
               debridement is the only cure followed by defect reconstruction after recovery in an interdisciplinary setting
               comprising urologists, gynaecologists, and general as well as plastic surgeons.

               Despite of the fact that 30% of males are circumcised world-wide, almost no data exists on genital wound
               healing and scarring . In recent times, the number of surgical interventions for gender reassignment
                                 [4]
               surgery and genital aesthetic surgery, especially labioplasty, has increased enormously with the need for
               more information on genital skin repair processes. It is also striking that female genital mutilation/cutting
               (FGM/C) patients have little to no hypertrophic scarring or keloid formation. This is in contrast to clinical
               observations of normal scar tissue formation in pigmented skin with a higher tendency for excessive
               scarring. The aim of this article is to inform on the anatomy and microstructure of genital skin, to delineate
               healing differences compared to skin of other body parts, and to encourage further research in this hitherto
               neglected area of genital skin wound repair.

               METHODS
               Data on genital postoperative scarring were derived from our own patient cohort with an observational
               period of 5 years. Pre- and postoperative examinations were performed as routine diagnostics and follow-
               ups for patient care. Genital surgery comprised plastic reconstructive surgery after urological interventions
               of biological men and women, tissue from trans-males and trans-females undergoing gender reassignment
               surgery and tissue from patients undergoing aesthetic genital surgery. The cohort comprised a total of
               68 patients (32.9 ± 11.3 years), of which 31 were male (mean 30.4 ± 9.3 years) and 37 were female (34.9 ±
               12.5 years; mean ± SD).
   821   822   823   824   825   826   827   828   829   830   831