Page 807 - Read Online
P. 807

Bair et al. Plast Aesthet Res 2020;7:68  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2020.74                                           Page 11 of 12

                Cates and Tyers [21]  Resolution in 85.7% of   N/A   N/A                Successful lid height
                                patients                                                (within 1 mm of desired
                                                                                        height) in 85.7% of
                                                                                        patients
                Morris et al. [34]  NA             Mean MRD from 0 to 2   N/A           57% of patients had
                                                   mm; satisfactory MRD-1               satisfactory symmetry (<
                                                   elevation in 85.7% pts               1 mm difference between
                                                                                        eyelid height)
                Ibrahim [35]    Resolution in all patients  Mean MRD from 3.6 mm  N/A   N/A
                                                   to 5.3 mm
                Dave et al. [22]  N/A (results not stratified  N/A   NA                 N/A
                                by MGJWS status)
                Xiang et al. [36]  Resolution in all patients  N/A   N/A                77% of patients had equal
                                                                                        palpebral apertures, 23%
                                                                                        had mild residual ptosis
                Manners et al. [37]  Resolution in 93% of   N/A      N/A                62% of patients had
                                patients                                                improved ptosis, 21% had
                                                                                        no change in ptosis, and
                                                                                        14% had worsened ptosis


               whether particular surgical approaches are more appropriate, effective, and safe for particular clinical
               scenarios.

               DECLARATIONS
               Authors’ contributions
               Made substantial contributions to conception and design of the study, performed data analysis and
               interpretation, and wrote the manuscript: Bair H, Garcia GA, Erickson BP


               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.

               Financial support and sponsorship
               Stanford University, Department of Ophthalmology is a recipient of an institutional Research to Prevent
               Blindness unrestricted grant and the National Eye Institute (P30-EY026877).


               Conflicts of interest
               All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.


               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               Not applicable.


               Consent for publication
               Not applicable.

               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2020.

               REFERENCES
               1.   Gunn RM. Congenital ptosis with peculiar associated movements of the affected lid. Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK 1883;3:283-7.
               2.   Pearce FC, McNab AA, Hardy TG. Marcus Gunn jaw-winking syndrome: a comprehensive review and report of four novel cases.
                   Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 2017;33:325-8.
               3.   Yamada K, Hunter DG, Andrews C, Engle EC. A novel KIF21A mutation in a patient with congenital fibrosis of the extraocular muscles
                   and Marcus Gunn jaw-winking phenomenon. Arch Ophthalmol 2005;123:1254-9.
               4.   Kacar Bayram A, Per H, Quon J, et al. A rare case of congenital fibrosis of extraocular muscle type 1A due to KIF21A mutation with
                   Marcus Gunn jaw-winking phenomenon. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2015;19:743-6.
   802   803   804   805   806   807   808   809   810   811   812