Page 806 - Read Online

Page 10 of 12 Bair et al. Plast Aesthet Res 2020;7:68 I http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2020.74

Table 6. Outcome measures reported in case series and retrospective reviews
Postoperative jaw-
Author(s) MRD-1 Upper eyelid excursion Eyelid height
winking
Bajaj et al. [15] Resolution (< 1 mm of N/A Lid lag 1.20 ± 0.48 Postoperative
excursion of upper eyelid lagophthalmos was 0.80
with synkinetic mouth ± 0.88 mm. Amount of
movement) in three ptosis correction 2.40 ±
patients. Improvement 0.50
in MGJWP (> 2 mm
decrease but > 1 mm of
excursion of upper eyelid
with synkinetic mouth
movement) in seven
patients
Betharia and Kumar [14] Resolution in all patients N/A N/A “Good correction” in
66.6% of patients;
lagoptalmos average 2 mm
(“minimal”)
Bartkowski et al. [29] Resolution in 84% of N/A N/A 68% of patients had
patients; improvement in proper width and
31.6% of patients symmetry of palpebral
fissures. Remaining had
marked improvement
Park et al. [30] Moderate degree of N/A N/A “Ideal”
residual jaw-winking
Shah et al. [31] Resolution in 39.1% of From -1.13 ± 0.916 to 3.17 ± N/A Ptosis correction was
patients, “improvement” in 0.865 mm “good” in 65.21% of
47.8% of patients, and no patients and “fair” in
improvement in 13.04% of 26.08% of patients
patients
Khwarg et al. [19] Resolution in 37.0% of For bilateral frontalis Only initial excursion was N/A
patients, mild winking (1 suspension with unilateral recorded: poor (≤ 4 mm) in
mm or less) on the lateral levator excision: 40% of 22.2% of eyelids, fair (5-7
jaw movement in 48.2% of patients had “good” and mm) in 19%, and good (8
patients “60%” had poor results. mm or more) in 59%
For bilateral frontalis
suspension with bilateral
levator excision: 68.4%
of patients had good and
31.6% had fair results
Bowyer and Sullivan [13] Unilateral levator N/A Only initial excursion was Improved
advancement: persistent. recorded: poor (≤ 4 mm)
Bilateral levator weakening in 7% of eyelids, fair (5-7
with bilateral frontalis mm) in 25%, and good (8
suspension: resolution mm or more) in 68%
Ning et al. [32] Resolution in all patients From -0.57 mm to 2.96 ± Preoperative mean Postoperative palpebral
0.48 mm. excursion was 3.69 ± 1.09 fissure height of the
mm operated eye in primary
gaze was 7.93 ± 0.58
mm, with no significant
difference to the
unaffected side
Demirici et al. [16] Resolved in 97% of N/A From 7.5 ± 2.3 mm for the Upper eyelid margin
patients, improved (from 6 ptotic eyelid and 13 ± 2.2 distance from 0.1 ± 1.8 to
mm to 2 mm) in 3% mm for the normal eyelid, 1.1 ± 0.9 mm
to 3.2 ± 0.9 mm for the
ptotic eyelid and 10.3 ±
3.3 mm for the opposite
normal eyelid
Doucet and Crawford [33] For bilateral suspension: N/A N/A Moderate/severe ptosis
resolution. For unilateral in 37.5% of patients with
suspension: no levator muscle excision
improvement and 8.3% of patients
with unilateral fascial
suspension
Ho et al. [24] N/A Final MRD-1 > 3 mm in N/A Lid height determined by
25% of patients MRD-1