Page 462 - Read Online
P. 462

Page 6 of 20                                       Citterio et al. Plast Aesthet Res 2020;7:41  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2020.29




                        BMSC group showed   reported -Immunohistochemical: GFP,  showed newly formed of   bone  All the groups with PRP  showed regeneration of   bone and cementum.   BMSC showed the best   regeneration.  and control group  Genetic expression of   ASCs and DPSCs are   bone  Bone, cementum and   ligament resulted   regenerated in both   PDLSC  regeneration
                     Results  neocementum along the  denuded dentin with bone  e ligament formation. No  root resorption or ankylosis   Defects treated with MSC   cementum, PL and alveolar   potential for periodontal   Test group showed higher  percentage of cementum  and PL regeneration. Bone  formation was equal in test   similar. Transplanted ASCs  regenerate PL, and alveolar   allogenic and autogenous   Both cell types improved   PL and bone tissue had been  generated








                        -Histological: HES, Azan   staining   -Histomorphometric   -Histological: HES   Proliferating Cell Nuclear   Antigen (PCNA)   -Histological: HES   -Histomorphometric   -Histological: HES   -Histomorphometric   -anatomical  -histological  -immunohistochemical  -Clinical: CAL, PD, GR,   blood and biochemical   tests -Histological: HES   -Histomorphometric   -Radiological: CT   -Clinical: CAL, PD,   GR -Histological: HES   -Radiological: CT   -Clinica
                     Analysis                                                                    -Histological: HES, toluidine   -Radiological: CT, micro-CT  -Biochemical: compressive







                    Study   period  1 month   1 month   2 months   2 months   15 weeks  3 months   3 months   6, 12   months   -SEM




                 Table 2. Summary of available evidence for periodontal regeneration with mesenchymal stem cells in animal studies
                     Treatment group  (a) BMSC + AC   (b) AC   (a) BMSC + AC   (b) no treatment  (a) BMSC+PRP (b) autogenous cortical bone   + PRP  (c) PRP (d) autogenous cortical bone  (e) no treatment  (a) BMSC + Demineralized   bovine bone matrix (b) Demineralized bovine   bone matrix  (a) collagen + rBMP2  (b) collagen  (a) PDLSC autologous + HA-  β-TCP  (b) PDLSC allogenic + HA-β-  (c) PDLC autologous and   allogenic + HA-β-TCP  (d) HA + β-TCP  (e) empty defect  (a)










                     Defect type  Class III   furcation defects  4 mm deep   Class III   furcation defects  4 mm deep  6 (a, b, c, d,  Class II furcation   defects  5 mm × 2 mm  Intrabony   defects 4 mm ×   4 mm  Extraction   sockets  defects 3 mm ×   7 mm × 5 mm  TCP   Intrabony   defects 5 mm ×   7 mm × 7 mm  Root-shaped   implant socket   4.1 mm × 10 mm





                    Defects   per group  Unclear   6  e)   9 (a, b)   14 (a,b)  6 (a, b, c, d,  Intrabony   e)   6 (a, b, c)  9 (b)



                     Animal model  DOG Beagle   female  12-20 months   old   DOG Beagle   female  12-20 months   old  DOG Mongrel  male  14-22 kg   New Zealand   withe RABBIT  2-12 months old  MINIATURE   PIG female   Wuzhishan,   male Guizhou  6-8 months old  MINIATURE PIG  female  9-12 months old  MINIATURE PIG  46 (a)  18 months old





                     Biomaterial  AC   AC   PRP   autologues   Demineralized  DOG Mongrel   bovine bone   matrix  Collagen  HA/β-TCP   + gelatin   membrane   HA/β-TCP   HA/TCP




                     Cell type  BMSC  BMSC  BMSC      BMSC     rADSCs  rDPSCs  PDLSC   PDLSC   SHED  PLSC  DPSC




                        Kawaguchi et al. [72]    Hasegawa et al. [53]  2006  Simsek et al. [70]  2012  Paknejad et al. [68]  2015  Hung et al. [85]  2011  Ding et al. [86]  2010  Fu et al. [87]  2014  Gao ZH et al. [91]  2016



                     Author  2004
   457   458   459   460   461   462   463   464   465   466   467