Page 460 - Read Online
P. 460

Page 4 of 20                                       Citterio et al. Plast Aesthet Res 2020;7:41  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2020.29
                                                                         [49]
               root development. SCAPs have infection-resistant properties too , and this may further explain why
               apexogenesis has been observed even in the presence of apical periodontitis. Despite being difficult to
               collect, they are a promising tool for regenerative procedures as they have multi-lineage differentiation
                       [50]
               potential .
               Non-dental stem cells
               BMMSCs were the first MSCs discovered and have been extensively tested more often on animal models.
               They have shown osteogenic, adipogenic, chondrogenic, and myogenic differentiation. The major
               shortcoming of BMMSCs is the pain of the bone marrow harvesting and the limited quantities that can
               be collected. BMMSCs can differentiate into ameloblast-like cells [51,52]  and periodontal tissue cells and can
               enhance periodontal regeneration [53,54] . Interestingly, besides periodontal regeneration, BMMSCs may be
               used for tooth regeneration as they can upregulate the expression of odontogenic genes and contribute to
                                                                             [55]
               new tooth formation after recombination with embryonic oral epithelium .
               ASCs are stem cells derived from adipose tissues and are abundant. ASCs allow in vitro expansion and have
               undergone osteogenic, chondrogenic, adipogenic, and neurogenic differentiation in various experimental
               settings. The harvesting method is less invasive than the method used for BMMSCs, since ASCs may
               be retrieved in high number from either liposuction or subcutaneous adipose tissue fragments. For this
               reason, they have been extensively used in regenerative medicine.

               ESCs are pluripotent stem cells found in human blastocysts. They show an extraordinary potential for
                                                                    [56]
               differentiation as they can develop into almost all cell lineages . In the context of periodontal research, it
               has been shown that ESCs can differentiate into odontogenic and periodontal cell lineages, in particular if
               co-cultured with PDLSCs or embryonic oral epithelium cell [57,58] . Ethical concerns have hampered the use
               of such cells for periodontal regeneration since their harvesting may result in the destruction of human
               blastocysts. Furthermore, besides their unlimited potential, they have shown major adverse effects such as
               tumors and unwanted immune responses.


               iPSCs were first discovered in 2006 and have since generated substantial interest in regenerative
               medicine . They are a type of pluripotent stem cell that can be generated directly from a somatic cell.
                       [59]
               They can duplicate indefinitely, as well as give rise to every other cell type in the body. Recently, dental cells
               including DPSCs, SHEDs, PDLSCs, and SCAPs have been successfully reprogrammed into iPSCs [60,61] , and
               iPCSs have been investigated for periodontal regeneration.

               ANIMAL STUDIES
               Before testing the performance of the use of stem cells in humans, its feasibility and safety have always been
               proven in animal studies. Up to now, more than 2000 articles that used stem cells for regeneration of both
               tooth and dental supporting tissues on animal models have been listed in MEDLINE. The main animal
               models used are dogs, mini-pigs, rats, and sheep.


               All different types of stem cells have been tested with several approaches (e.g., different isolation processes,
               different implantation methods, etc.) with promising results in terms of regeneration of bone and dental
               supporting tissues (PL and root cementum) [62,63] . Although promising, from all these studies, no clear
               clinical protocol can be ultimately validated due to the heterogeneity of the investigation designs and
               because we still do not have a complete understanding of how these cells interact in the healing and
               regenerative processes [Tables 1 and 2]. Of course, more studies are needed to elucidate these aspects in
               greater details and better select a stem cell-based protocol for periodontal regeneration. Different results
               among studies can be ascribed to the different protocols used. The main differences that play an important
                                                                              [64]
               role in the outcomes are the characteristics of the donor, especially age ; the isolation and expansion
   455   456   457   458   459   460   461   462   463   464   465