Page 321 - Read Online
P. 321

Lee et al. Plast Aesthet Res 2018;5:43  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2018.39                                                  Page 7 of 9
                                                                                                        [14]
               Temple - volume loss in the temples leads to prominence of the bony orbital rim and lateral brow ptosis .
               A more robust product with a high G’, such as Juvederm Voluma®, Restylane Lyft®, or Radiesse® (a calcium
               hydroxylapatite product), is preferable in this area. When introducing filler in this region, care must be
               taken to avoid both the blood vessels and branches of the facial nerve coursing through this area. Recall that
               the path of the facial nerve as it courses through the superficial temporal fascia may be roughly estimated by
                                                                                         [15]
               drawing a line from 0.5 cm inferior to the tragus to 1.5 cm superior to the lateral brow . Injection should
               be initiated in the area of greatest volume loss and typically at least 1 cm lateral to the lateral orbital rim. A
               deep plane under the fascia of the temporal muscle on the periosteum is generally safe and also provides a
               nice cosmetic result. Injection volume varies from less than 1 to over 2 mL per side depending on the degree
               of correction required.


               Filler may also be used to address static rhytids in combination with toxin injection, as well as to restore
               volume and arch to the lateral brow, crows’ feet and glabella.


               Potential complications
               Complications of dermal filler injections include Tyndall effect (a bluish hue to the skin resulting from
               superficial filler injection), irregular surface contour, hypersensitivity reaction and/or granulomatous
               inflammation, and the development of festoons or chronic fluid collections. The most serious potential side
               effects include vascular occlusion leading to tissue necrosis or worse, blindness from retrobulbar hemorrhage
               or central retinal artery occlusion. In general, proper injection technique and depth minimize the risk
               of poor cosmetic outcomes such as the Tyndall effect or contour irregularities. As mentioned above, the
               choice of filler with low water affinity is important to avoiding the development of chronic fluid collections.
               Vascular occlusions are discussed in more depth below.


               Vascular occlusion and ocular ischemia: the most devastating potential complications of
               dermal filler injection
               Intra-arterial injection of filler may result in vascular occlusion with either anterograde or retrograde
               embolus of product. Local embolus can lead to soft tissue necrosis or a distant embolus can lead to
               permanent blindness. If the force of intra-arterial injection is greater than mean arterial blood pressure,
               retrograde flow can potentially introduce filler into the ophthalmic or central retinal artery, or long and short
               posterior ciliary arteries, leading to visual loss. More proximal flow may introduce filler into the middle
               cerebral artery resulting in cerebral infarction. If tissue necrosis should occur, there are several important
               steps to take to restore perfusion. First, warm compresses can be used to promote local vasodilation (this
               low risk treatment is theoretically helpful, although there is no data to support its efficacy and there is some
               worry that vasodilation can encourage an embolus to flow further distally). Topical nitroglycerin may also
               be used to promote vasodilation, with the same theoretical advantages and disadvantages. Again, there is
                                               [16]
               no evidence proving its effectiveness . Second, the area should be flooded with injected hyaluronidase;
               this is the only proven treatment for this complication. Generally, subcutaneous injection is thought to be
               sufficient, but intra-arterial administration may also be considered if possible and time allows. Practically,
               reintroduction of the needle into the occluded artery may not be possible, and prior studies have shown that
                                                                         [17]
               extravascular hyaluronidase is effective on the intravascular material .
               It is important to have a large volume of hyaluronidase easily accessible for prompt treatment; we
               recommend at least 10 (unexpired) vials. There are a variety of hyaluronidase formulations available, which
               may be of human recombinant or animal derived origin. Characteristics such as storage parameters,
               preservatives, units per vial, and reconstitution requirements vary. Although different types of filler
               may respond to hyaluronidase differently, there is no evidence to suggest that a specific hyaluronidase
                                        [18]
               formulation is more effective . Although there are rare reports of allergic reactions to hyaluronidase, skin
   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326