Page 167 - Read Online

Omranipour et al. Ipsilateral or contralateral TRAM flap

Literature research and manuscript preparation: free. J Surg Oncol 2006;94:532-7.
S. Mashayekhi, H. Mahmoodzadeh 6. Knox AD, Ho AL, Leung L, Tashakkor AY, Lennox PA, Van Laeken
Data acquisition: S. Alipour N, Macadam SA. Comparison of outcomes following autologous
Data analysis and statistical analysis and manuscript breast reconstruction using the DIEP and pedicled TRAM flaps: a 12-
year clinical retrospective study and literature review. Plast Reconstr
editing: M. Vasigh Surg 2016;138:16-28.
7. Olding M, Emory RE, Barrett WL. Preferential use of the ipsilateral
Financial support and sponsorship pedicle in TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg
None. 1998;40:349-53.
8. Clugston PA, Gingrass MK, Azurin D, Fisher J, Maxwell GP.
Ipsilateral pedicled TRAM flaps: the safer alternative? Plast Reconstr
Conflicts of interest Surg 2000;105:77-82.
There are no conflicts of interest. 9. Janiga TA, Atisha DM, Lytle IF, Wilkins EG, Alderman AK.
Ipsilateral pedicle TRAM flaps for breast reconstruction: are they
Patient consent as safe as contralateral techniques? J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg
Not applicable. 2010;63:322-6.
10. Ozkan A, Cizmeci O, Aydin H, Ozden BC, Tümerdem B, Emekli
U, Asoğlu O, Bozfakioğlu Y. The use of the ipsilateral versus
Ethics approval contralateral pedicle and vertical versus horizontal flap inset models
Approved by the ethics committee and the patients in TRAM flap breast reconstruction: the aesthetic outcome. Aesthetic
were informed about this study during their follow-up Plast Surg 2002;26:451-6.
period. 11. Fathi M, Hatamipour E, Fathi HR, Zehtab H. Breast reconstruction
using tram flap: prospective outcome and complications. MJIRI
2006;20:74-81.
REFERENCES 12. Clugston PA, Gingrass MK, Azurin D, Fisher J, Maxwell GP.
Ipsilateral pedicled TRAM flaps: the safer alternative? Plast Reconstr
1. Eltahir Y, Werners LL, Dreise MM, van Emmichoven IA, Jansen Surg 2000;105:77-82.
L, Werker PM, de Bock GH. Quality-of-life outcomes between 13. Ascherman JA, Seruya M, Bartsich SA. Abdominal wall morbidity
mastectomy alone and breast reconstruction: comparison of patient- following unilateral and bilateral breast reconstruction with pedicled
reported BREAST-Q and other health-related quality-of-life measures. TRAM flaps: an outcomes analysis of 117 consecutive patients. Plast
Plast Reconstr Surg 2013;132:e201-9. Reconstr Surg 2008;121:1-8.
2. Hu ES, Pusic AL, Waljee JF, Kuhn L, Hawley ST, Wilkins E, 14. Tribondeau P, Soffray F. Breast reconstruction with pedicled TRAM
Alderman AK. Patient-reported aesthetic satisfaction with breast flap (a retrospective study of 115 consecutive cases). Ann Chir Plast
reconstruction during the long-term survivorship period. Plast Esthet 2008;53:309-17. (in French)
Reconstr Surg 2009;124:1-8. 15. Shestak KC. Technical tips for avoiding complications in TRAM flap
3. Grotting JC, Beckenstein MS, Arkoulakis NS. The art and science of breast reconstruction. In: Reoperative Plastic Surgery of the Breast.
autologous breast reconstruction. Breast J 2003;9:350-60. PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006. p. 302-39.
4. Omranipour R, Lebaschi AH, Mohagheghi MA, Arab-Kheradmand 16. Zenn MR, May JW Jr. TRAM flap reconstruction: the single pedicle,
A, Abasahl A. Outcomes of breast reconstruction with pedicled whole muscle technique. In: Spear SL, editors. Surgery of the Breast:
transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (tram) flap at cancer Principles and Art. PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006. p. 732-40.
institute, a retrospective study of 10 years of experience. Acta Medica 17. Alipour S, Omranipour R, Akrami R. Obesity should not prevent from
Iranica 2008;46:218-24. TRAM flap breast reconstruction in developing countries. Indian J
5. Serletti JM. Breast reconstruction with the TRAM flap: pedicled and Surg 2015;77:341-4.

160 Plastic and Aesthetic Research ¦ Volume 4 ¦ September 29, 2017