Page 164 - Read Online
P. 164

Omranipour et al.                                                                                                                                                                Ipsilateral or contralateral TRAM flap

           receptor, P53, Her2Neu), history of post-mastectomy   regression analysis to evaluate their independence
           radiotherapy or chemotherapy and finally the time   as predictors. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence
           length between mastectomy and reconstruction       intervals were calculated.
           were abstracted from the medical records. Type of
           pedicle TRAM (ipsilateral vs. contralateral), timing of   RESULTS
           the procedure (immediate vs. delayed), and usage
           of mesh for the abdominal wall closure were also   Table 1 presents the baseline characteristics of the
           recorded.                                          study population and the type of procedures. Out of
                                                              110 patients who were included in the study, 87 had
           All patients had follow-up examinations every week for   ipsilateral and 23 contralateral pedicle TRAM flaps.
           the first month and monthly thereafter for 6 months.   There were no significant differences in demographic
           Postoperative outcomes were assessed using clinical   characteristics between ipsilateral and contralateral
           data records if available, otherwise we communicated   pedicle TRAM flap groups. Tumor size and the
           with the patients’ physicians. The mean follow-up   number of lymph node involvement were higher in
           duration was 2.69 years for ipsilateral group and 3.21   contralateral pedicle TRAM flap group. Immediate
           years for contralateral group.                     reconstruction was more commonly performed in
                                                              contralateral pedicle TRAM flap group, (34.8% vs.
           Immediate post-reconstructive complications were   10.3%, respectively).
           recorded. Postoperative complications were then
           categorized into major or minor events. Complications   Co-morbidities included hypertension, diabetes mellitus,
           which required re-admission or re-hospitalization such   hyperlipidemia, presence of abdominal scar, and
           as total flap loss were defined as complete necrosis   smoking. The two procedures had similar clinical and
           of the skin and fat; partial flap loss, was defined   demographic characteristics. Co-morbidities were more
           as ischemic tissue loss exceeding 25% of the flap.   common in ipsilateral pedicle TRAM group.
           Wound infection was defined as redness, swelling, and
           exudate and requiring antibiotics. Seroma formation   Table 2 summarizes the categories of complications
           was defined as palpable fluctuation of subcutaneous   during follow-up period. Comparing the ipsilateral with
           tissues requiring suction or drainage. Hematoma,   the contralateral TRAM groups, the incidence of flap
           requiring evacuation, pulmonary embolism, sepsis,   complications that did not require surgical intervention
           hernia, ileus and acute renal failure were categorized   was 19.7% in ipsilateral and 30.4% in contralateral
           as major complications. All the other complications   pedicle TRAM flap, respectively. The incidence of
           were categorized as minor.                         flap loss requiring revision was significantly higher in
                                                              contralateral group (P = 0.001). Major complications
           SPSS 20 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used     (any complication that required hospital admission
           for statistical analysis, with comparison of discrete   or operative procedure) were noted in 11.5% of the
           variables by Pearson chi-square or Fisher’s exact test,   ipsilateral pedicle TRAM patients and 26.1% of the
           and comparison of means by t-test. A value of P <   contralateral group (P < 0.001). Minor complications
           0.05 was considered significant. Predictors exhibiting   were noted in 17.2% of the ipsilateral pedicle TRAM
           a statistically significant relation with postoperative   patients and in 34.8% of the contralateral group,
           morbidity were taken for multivariate logistic     respectively (P < 0.001). When individual complications

           Table 1: Baseline characteristics of the study population and the type of procedures for breast reconstruction, n (%)
                                                    Ipsilateral pedicled   Contralateral pedicled
           Characteristics                                                                             P
                                                      TRAM (n = 87)           TRAM (n = 23)
           Age (years), mean ± SD                      42.58 ± 9.15             39.22 ± 6.6           0.99
                            2
           Body mass index (kg/m ), mean ± SD          27.43 ± 4.28             24.54 ± 3.47          0.64
           Diabetes mellitus                             9 (10.1)                 1 (4.3)             0.003
           Hypertension                                  6 (6.9)                  1 (4.3)             0.002
           Hyperlipidemia                                1 (1.1)                  0 (0.0)             0.011
           Tobacco use                                    7 (8)                   1 (4.3)             0.005
           Abdominal scar                               22 (25.3)                11 (47.8)            0.004
           History of radiotherapy                      65 (74.7)                12 (52.2)            0.025
           History of chemotherapy                      61 (70.9)                19 (82.6)            0.67
           Immediate reconstruction                      9 (10.3)                8 (34.8)             0.001
           Time between mastectomy and reconstruction  50.39 ± 42.14           36.51 ± 30.65          0.071
           TRAM: transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous
                           Plastic and Aesthetic Research ¦ Volume 4 ¦ September 29, 2017                 157
   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169