Page 156 - Read Online
P. 156
Fariña et al. Skeletal anchorage for rigid external distractor
controls the vector during midfacial advancement. J Craniofac Surg Trujillo-Saldarriaga S. Combination of transconjunctival and lateral
2016;27:1056-9. canthotomy with modified endaural approaches in midface osteogenic
13. McCarthy JG, Schreiber J, Karp N, Thorne CH, Grayson BH. distraction. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016;54:707-9.
Lengthening the human mandible by gradual distraction. Plast 17. Nout E, Wolvius EB, van Adrichem LN, Ongkosuwito EM, van der
Reconstr Surg 1992;89:1-8; discussion 9-10. Wal KG. Complications in maxillary distraction using the RED II
14. Figueroa AA, Polley JW, Figueroa AD. Biomechanical considerations device: a retrospective analysis of 21 patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac
for distraction of the monobloc, Le Fort III, and Le Fort I segments. Surg 2006;35:897-902.
Plast Reconstr Surg 2010;126:1005-13. 18. Nishimoto S, Oyama T, Shimizu F, Tsugawa T, Nagashima T,
15. Tong H, Liu L, Tang X, Song T, Yin N, Zhang Z, Zhao Z. Midface Yamamoto K, Kamiji T, Kanomi R. Fronto-facial monobloc
distraction osteogenesis using a modified external device with elastic advancement with rigid external distraction (RED-II) system. J
distraction for crouzon syndrome. J Craniofac Surg 2017; DOI: Craniofac Surg 2004;15:54-9.
10.1097/SCS.0000000000003377 19. Patel N, Fearon JA. Treatment of the syndromic midface: a long-term
16. Fernández-Olarte H, Gómez-Delgado A, Varón-Cardona D, assessment at skeletal maturity. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015;135:e731-42.
Plastic and Aesthetic Research ¦ Volume 4 ¦ September 05, 2017 149