Page 77 - Read Online
P. 77

Figure  2:  (a)  A  30-year-old  male  with  a  history  of  road  traffic  accident  presented  with  penoscrotal  defect,  exposed  testes,  and  urethral  injury;
         (b)  debridement  and  urethroplasty  were  performed;  (c)  pedicled  gracilis  muscle  flap  was  harvested;  (d)  the  gracilis  muscle  flap  was  insetted;  (e)
         split skin grafting over the muscle flap; (f) 1-year postoperative result
         Table 1: Details of the patients included in the study
         Age    Etiology       Affected Time of    Procedure done            Follow-up            Complications
         (years)               side    reconstruction                        (postoperative)
         45     Fournier’s gangrene  B/L   27 days  Local flap advancement with SSG  8 months (satisfactory)  -
         56     Fournier’s gangrene  B/L   20 days  Local flap advancement with SSG 12 month (satisfactory)  Wound
                                                                                                  infection
         58     Fournier’s gangrene  B/L   31 days  Local flap advancement with SSG 6 months (highly   -
                                                                             satisfactory)
         51     Fournier’s gangrene  B/L   18 days  ALT flap                  8 month (satisfactory)  -
         48     Fournier’s gangrene  B/L   2 months  Local flap advancement with SSG 10 months (unsatisfied)  Wound
                                                                                                  infection
         42     Fournier’s gangrene  B/L   28 days  Gracilis muscle flap with SSG   9 months (highly    -
                                                                             satisfactory)
         47     Fournier’s gangrene  B/L   1.5 months   Local flap advancement with SSG 15 months (unsatisfied)  Dehiscence
         52     Fournier’s gangrene  B/L   38 days  ALT flap                  6 months (satisfactory)  -
         55     Fournier’s gangrene  B/L   26 days  Medial thigh flap         12 months (highly    -
                                                                             satisfactory)
         47     Fournier’s gangrene  B/L   2 months  ALT flap                 5 months (unsatisfi ed)  Wound
                                                                                                  infection
         57     Fournier’s gangrene  B/L   2 months  Medial thigh flap        8 months (satisfactory)  -
         51     Fournier’s gangrene  B/L   1 month  Gracilis muscle flap with SSG    9 months (highly   -
                                                                             satisfactory)
         32     Trauma          B/L    4 days      Gracilis muscle flap with SSG    6 months (highly   -
                                                                             satisfactory)
         35     Trauma          B/L    3 days      Medial thigh flap          12 months (highly    -
                                                                             satisfactory)
         30     Trauma          B/L    12 days     ALT flap                   11 months (satisfactory)  -
         38     Trauma          B/L    Immediate   Local flap advancement with SSG 7 months (unsatisfi ed)  Dehiscence
         34     Burns           B/L    2 months    Gracilis muscle flap with SSG   6 months (satisfactory)  Dehiscence
         42     Burns           B/L    1 month     Local flap advancement with SSG 8 months (satisfactory)  -
         SSG: split skin grafting; B/L: bilateral; U/L: unilateral; ALT: anterolateral thigh
                                                                            [4]
         regional and muscle flaps were superior in comparison to   of  these  defects.   The  spermatic  cord  can  be  partially
         the local flap  advancement  with  SSG.  This  study  did    retracted up into the inguinal canals, and testicles should
         not  include the assessment of sexual function, and further   be  sutured  together  to  minimize  motion  and  maximize
         studies are needed.                                 graft   take.   Long-term   success   with   skin   grafting   for
                                                             scrotal injury is excellent, and only 20% of patients require
         DISCUSSION                                          significant revisions or reconstructions. However, SSG may
                                                             have  certain  disadvantages  such  as  technical  difficulty
         SSG  for  scrotal  avulsion  injuries  was  first  advocated  by   at recipient site, poor graft take, contraction and distortion,
         Millard   and   subsequently   by   Maguina. [4-6]    In   cases   of   lack of protective sensation, and less acceptable cosmetic
         complete  loss  of  penile  and  scrotum  skin,  grafting  may   results.  An  SSG  does  not  take  if  the  testes  have  been
         be the most successful and simplest option in the closure   stripped of the tunica vaginalis. SSG is a better option for
         66                                                                   Plast Aesthet Res || Vol 3 || Issue 2 || Feb 29, 2016
   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82