Page 390 - Read Online
P. 390

Kim et al.                                                                                                                                                                                                      Elasticum suspension

           can be calculated as mCA plus 90° minus SSA (cCA =   Acknowledgments
           mCA + 90° - SSA) [Figure 4].                       We thank Miss Seong Kyung Yoo, BS, for her help in
                                                              measurement and being object of Figure 4.
           In our preoperative and postoperative measurements,
           elasticum suspension significantly decreased the CA   Financial support and sponsorship
           (P < 0.001, -5.5 ± 9.8%). This procedure significantly   This study was supported by Inha University (INHA-
           decreased the Gn-Li distance (P < 0.001, -18.4 ±   Research Grant).
           25.5%). The Gn-C/Gn-Li ratio increased significantly
           (P < 0.001, 62.8 ± 85.8%), while the C-T/Gn-C ratio   Conflicts of interest
           decreased significantly (P = 0.007, -7.1 ± 45.2%)   There are no conflicts of interest.
           [Table 3].
                                                              Patient consent
           In the 46 patients that were operated on, suspension
           was performed with skin excision in 34 patients    Informed consent was obtained from paients.
           who had skin redundancies, whereas 12 patients
           underwent suspension without skin excision. The    Ethics approval
           purpose of skin excision was not to pull the skin,   All procedures performed in studies involving human
           but to prevent tissue from getting jammed. Minor   participants were in accordance with the ethical
           jammed soft tissues were found to have subsided    standards of the institutional and/or national research
           spontaneously within a few weeks.                  committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and
                                                              its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
           For three parameters (CA, Gn-C, and Gn-Li), no
           significant differences were found between the SE   REFERENCES
           group and SO group. Regarding the Gn-C/Gn-Li ratio,   1.   Tonnard P, Verpaele A, Monstrey S, Van Landuyt K, Blondeel
           the RCR was significantly higher in the SO group      P, Hamdi M, MattonG. Minimal access cranial suspension lift: a
           (179.4 ± 69.7%) than the SE group (21.7 ± 41.6%).     modified S-lift. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;109:2074-86.
           For the C-T/Gn-C ratio, the RCR was significantly   2.   Saylan  Z. Liposhifting  instead  of  lipofilling:  treatment  of
           higher in the SE group (3.6 ± 47.4%) than the SO      postlipoplasty irregularities. Aesthet Surg J 2001;21:137-41.
           group (-37.4 ± 15.2%) [Table 4].                   3.   Fulton JE, Saylan Z, Helton P, Rahimi AD, Golshani M. The S-lift
                                                                 facelift featuring the U-suture and O-suture combined with skin
                                                                 resurfacing. Dermatol Surg 2001;27:18-22.
           The advantages of the elasticum suspension are as   4.   Capurro S, Rava C, Berlanda M. Elastic MACS and neck lift in men.
                                ®
           follows. First, Elasticum  does not cut into the tissues.   CRPUB Med Video J [Internet]. 2010. Available from: http://www.
           It is composed of a silicone core and surrounding     crpub.org/index.php?option=com_k2&view=item&id=52:10-elastic-
           braided  polyester,  and  the  braided  polyester     macs-and-neck-lift-in-men&Itemid=114. [Last accessed on 2016 Oct 17]
           effectively acts as a nidus for collagen and elastin to   5.   Capurro S. Elastic neck lift in elderly patient. CRPUB Med Video
                                                                 J [Internet]. 2009. Available from: http://www.crpub.org/index.
           develop, similarly to a neoligament. [11]  Second, it has   php?option=com_k2&view=item&id=51:09-elastic-neck-lift-in-
           the same consistency as the subcutaneous tissue,      elderly-patients&Itemid=114. [Last accessed on 2016 Oct 17]
           and is not palpable after placement. Third, the depth   6.   Hwang K, Nam YS, Kim DJ, Han SH. Anatomy of tympanoparotid
           of the thread can be referenced by the depth mark on   fascia relating to neck lift. J Craniofac Surg 2008;19:648-51.
           the Jano needle.                                   7.   Ellenbogen R, Karlin JV. Visual criteria for success in restoring the
                                                                 youthful neck. Plast Reconstr Surg 1980;6:26-37.
                                                              8.   Kang MS, Shin JS, Nam SM, Park ES. Evaluation of elastic lift for
           Based on our results, it appears that the elasticum   facial rejuvenation. Arch Aesthetic Plast Surg 2016;22:20-7.
           suspension technique may be a satisfactory minimally   9.   Kang MS, Kim SH, Nam SM, Park ES. Evaluation of elastic lift for
           invasive method for neck lifts. Elasticum suspension   neck rejuvenation. Arch Aesthetic Plast Surg 2016;22:68-73.
           can be performed together with submental and       10.  Stringer MD, Mirjalili SA, Meredith SJ, Muirhead JC. Redefining
           superficial jowl liposuction. If necessary, a perioral   the surface anatomy of the parotid duct: an in vivo ultrasound study.
                                                                 Plast Reconstr Surg 2012;130:1032-7.
           fat graft could be performed. This technique could be   11.  Huggins RJ, Freeman ME, Kerr JB, Mendelson BC. Histologic and
           also applied to the lifting the upper lip or breast, as   ultrastructural evaluation of sutures used for surgical fixation of the
           well as scar revisions.                               SMAS. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2007;31:719-24.









                           Plastic and Aesthetic Research ¦ Volume 3 ¦ December 23, 2016                  389
   385   386   387   388   389   390   391   392   393   394   395