Page 56 - Read Online
P. 56

a         b









                    c         d         e                              a               b
          Figure  3:  (a) The  proximal  end  of the  left  forearm;  (b) the  implanted   Figure 4: Appearance 18 months after surgery. (a) Extension; (b) flexion
          hand is dissected from the ectopic site;  (c) the hand is amputated
          from the  ectopic site;  (d and e) replantation is  completed, (d) palmar
          view; (e) dorsal view                               on  matching  the  vessels  between  the  recipient  site  and
                                                              the implanted part. In our case, a venous network on
          Outcome evaluation                                  the dorsum of the foot was presented, which can be
          The hand survived with normal color and capillary   included in  the  dorsalis  pedis  fasciocutaneous  flap.  In
          refilling  test,  partial flap necrosis  was noted, but  healed   the second‑stage  foot‑to‑forearm transfer, the flap can
          with wound care. Bone healing was achieved 4  months   be transferred to the forearm along with the hand,
          after the second operation. Eighteen  months after   without the need for additional  vascular  anastomosis.
          surgery [Figure 4], two‑point discrimination on the pulps   In  our  case,  the  flap  provided  sufficient  room  for  the
          of the first through fifth digits was 4, 6, 7, 5, and 8 mm,   underlying tendons and nerves. We believe a groin
          respectively. Tenolysis  was not performed because the   flap  or  superficial  inferior  epigastric  artery  flap  may
          patient refused. Tange of motion arcs for the first to   be needed in other cases for which a larger space
          fifth metacarpophalangeal joints were 5°, 10°, 4°, 0°, and   may  be  needed  to  facilitate  easier  tendon  and  nerve
          3°, respectively; for the  proximal  interphalangeal  joints,   reconstructions. In addition, physical therapy of the
          2°, 5°, 2°, 3°, and 0°, respectively; and for the  distal   amputated parts before reattached to prevent joint
          interphalangeal joints,  0°, 0°, 2°, 0°, and 0°, respectively.   stiffness and tendon adhesions, the special needs at the
          The  patient  reported no  pain  for the  hand or  forearm.   secondary replantation, such as flaps for the coverage
                                                      [6]
          The disability score for the arm, shoulder, and hand  was   soft tissue defects at the recipient site and patient
          78.  Based  on a foot function assessment,  the patient   acceptance should also be considered.
                                               [7]
          reported no foot pain and had no difficulty when he   Indications for temporary ectopic hand implantation are
          stood on tiptoe or walked in the house. The patient had   severe injuries on the proximal end of the limb where
          no difficulty when he walked outside for four blocks,   salvation of the hand in situ is difficult, and the distal part
          climbed or descended stairs, got up from a chair, climbed   is mildly injured. Contraindication is severe injured in the
          curbs, ran, or walked quickly.                      distal part where revascularization is impossible.

          DISCUSSION                                          Function of the reattached parts can  vary widely. As
                                                              these  are  severe  and complex  injuries,  satisfactory
          Since  the  first  replant almost  52‑year‑ago,  thousands   results  may  not be  attained  in  many  patients.  In  such
          of severed hands have been reattached, preserving the   case, the inconvenience during the banking period
          quality of life for these patients through improved function   and inappropriateness  of shoe  wearing,  especially in  a
          and appearance that the void remaining after amputation   cold area,  should be  considered.  In  addition, the  cost
                       [8]
          cannot provide.  Revascularization procedures are often   is  generally higher than that of direct replantation or
          easier than replantation, but incomplete amputations with   revascularization. Therefore, the benefits and risks should
          an extensive crush‑avulsion injury may be more difficult   be discussed carefully before undertaking these surgical
          because debridement of nonviable tissue and bone    reconstructions.
          shortening cannot retain healthy structures. In such cases,
          the  percentage  of viability  is  lower.  Temporary  ectopic   REFERENCES
          implantation offers an approach to detach the distal part
          safely from the injured site, which improves subsequent   1.   Ni G, Wu X, Zhang D, Yang H, Ma X, Sun X. Temporary ectopic implantation
                                                                  of amputated fingers and dorsalis pedis flaps for thumb reconstruction
          viability. [9]                                          and skin defect repair of hands. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi
          Several recipient sites are available for temporary ectopic   2013;27:1094‑7.(in Chinese)
          implantation,  including  the  groin,  lower  leg,  foot,  and   2.   Godina M, Bajec J, Baraga A. Salvage of the mutilated upper extremity with
                                                                  temporary ectopic implantation of the undamaged part. Plast Reconstr Surg
          opposite arm and hand. [4‑7]  Selection is generally based   1986;78:295‑9.
          Plast Aesthet Res || Vol 2 || Issue 1 ||  Jan 15, 2015                                            45
   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61