Page 70 - Read Online
P. 70

Yu et al. Plast Aesthet Res 2022;9:37  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2021.124  Page 5 of 11














                          Figure 2. A: End-to-side anastomosis; B: flow-through anastomosis; C: branched interposition vein graft.


               the calcium plaques on the vessel may fracture, and Acland clamps frequently do not provide enough
               pressure to occlude these very stiff vessels. We prefer to use vessel loops and a red rubber catheter as a
               Rummel tourniquet to atraumatically stop inflow during anastomosis in these cases.

               Care should be taken to create the appropriate size arteriotomy - an arteriotomy that is too large will cause
               the flap vessel to take on an oval shape which predisposes to backwalling during anastomosis. In smaller
               recipient arteries, a stay stitch may be used to help the assistant retract the side of the arteriotomy and
               provide adequate visualization for the surgeon. Sutures should be placed closer together at the “heel” of the
               anastomosis, as these are the points that are most likely to leak, and a rescue stitch in this location is quite
               difficult to visualize. We find these sutures are best taken in two steps to ensure the appropriate angle. After
               restoring flow through the vessel, the pedicle is frequently vasospastic and may require additional
               adventitial stripping. Allowing the flap to re-perfuse for several minutes before restoring perfusion to the
               foot may help diminish this vasospasm.


               Flow-through flap
               Flow-through free flaps are a valuable technique for lower extremity reconstruction in the setting of
               vascular injury. A flow-through flap is characterized by anastomosis at two sites along the recipient artery
               using a segment of flap artery as an interpositional graft [Figure 2B] to reconstruct the recipient artery. The
               blood flow enters the flap through a native branch at an anatomic angle. Historically, flow-through flaps
                                                                                                 [29]
               were performed for simultaneous reconstruction of soft tissue and vascular defects. Soutar et al.  initially
               described a flow-through radial forearm free flap for head and neck reconstruction, which preserved blood
               flow through the facial artery. This technique was subsequently expanded to include the reconstruction of
                                               [30]
               extremities with segmental vessel loss .
               This technique is well-suited for free flap coverage of single-vessel extremities. In general, two end-to-end
               anastomoses tend to be less technically demanding compared to a single end-to-side anastomosis.
               Additional benefits are that a segment of injured or unhealthy vessels can be replaced with healthy vessels,
               and dissection does not need to be carried as far out of the zone of injury. The flow-through flap can also be
               used as a second attempt for the reconstruction of a previously unsuccessful end-to-side anastomosis with
               excision and interpositional reconstruction of the perfusing vessel.

               Performing a flow-through flap requires appropriate anatomy from the donor - the perfusion to the flap
               needs to come off a branch of a larger segment of expendable artery. Three commonly used flow-through
               flaps used in lower extremity reconstruction include the latissimus dorsi muscle, anterolateral thigh
               fasciocutaneous, and radial forearm fasciocutaneous flaps.
   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75