Page 64 - Read Online
P. 64

Page 8 of 9              Kondra et al. Plast Aesthet Res 2022;9:36  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2021.121

               In conclusion, this study examines outcomes of over 15 years of experience with lower extremity
               reconstruction employing soleus flaps at a Level 1 trauma center. Although the flap loss rate in this cohort
               was 0%, the findings demonstrate higher than expected infectious complications. Additionally, our results
               reveal only 16% of soleus flaps were performed at our institution after 2015. As surgeons consider the
               reconstructive ladder for lower extremity trauma, a rotational soleus muscle flap should not be overlooked
               in the modern era of free flap tissue transfers and might be a more optimal flap choice in certain patients
               with multiple comorbidities. Future studies should evaluate the difference in functional and aesthetic
               outcomes based on flap type and evaluate the impact of patient comorbidities and demographics on wound
               healing and ambulation.


               DECLARATIONS
               Authors’ contributions
               Assisted with study concept and design: Roohani I, Kondra K, Carey J
               Acquired, analyzed, or interpreted the data: Roohani I, Kondra K, Jimenez C, Stanton E, Becerra J
               Drafted the manuscript: Kondra K, Jimenez C, Stanton E, Roohani I
               Provided critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Kondra K, Carey J
               Calculated statistical analysis: Roohani I, Jimenez C, Stanton E
               Provided administrative, technical, or material support: Carey J
               Supervised study: Carey J

               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.


               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.


               Conflicts of interest
               All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.


               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               Not applicable.

               Consent for publication
               Not applicable.

               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2022.

               REFERENCES
               1.       Hidalgo DA, Shaw WW. Reconstruction of foot injuries. Clin Plast Surg 1986;13:663-80.  PubMed
               2.       Yaremchuk MJ, Manson PN. Local and free flap donor sites for lower-extremity reconstruction. Lower extremity salvage and
                   reconstruction:  orthopedic  and  plastic  surgical  management.  New  York:  Elsevier  1989:117-57.  Available  from:
                   https://www.amazon.com/Lower-Extremity-Salvage-Reconstruction-Orthopaedic/dp/0444013334 [Last accessed on 1 Apr 2022].
               3.       Grotting JC, Vasconez LO. Regional blood supply and the selection of flaps for reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 1986;13:581-93.
                   PubMed
               4.       Parrett BM, Matros E, Pribaz JJ, Orgill DP. Lower extremity trauma: trends in the management of soft-tissue reconstruction of open
                   tibia-fibula fractures. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;117:1315-22; discussion 1323.  DOI  PubMed
               5.       Song P, Pu LLQ. The Soleus Muscle Flap: An overview of its clinical applications for lower extremity reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg
                   2018;81:S109-16.  DOI  PubMed
               6.       Gosain A, Chang N, Mathes S, Hunt TK, Vasconez L. A study of the relationship between blood flow and bacterial inoculation in
   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69