Page 61 - Read Online
P. 61

Kondra et al. Plast Aesthet Res 2022;9:36  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2021.121  Page 5 of 9

               Table 2. Injury & flap characteristics
                                                                                    n (%)
                Mechanism of injury
                  Auto versus pedestrian (AVP)                                      34 (49.3%)
                  Motorcycle crash (MCC)                                            7 (10.1%)
                  Other                                                             7 (10.1%)
                  Gunshot wound (GSW)                                               5 (7.2%)
                  Falls                                                             5 (7.2%)
                  Auto versus stationary body                                       4 (5.9%)
                  Motor vehicle collision (MVC)                                     4 (5.9%)
                  Crush                                                             2 (2.9%)
                Soft tissue coverage
                  Middle 1/3 only                                                   40 (58.8%)
                  Distal 1/3 only                                                   15 (22.1%)
                  Middle 1/3 + distal 1/3                                           5 (7.4%)
                  Proximal 1/3 only                                                 5 (7.4%)
                  Proximal 1/3 + middle 1/3                                         1 (1.5%)
                  Proximal 1/3 + distal 1/3                                         1 (1.5%)
                  Proximal 1/3 + middle 1/3 + distal 1/3                            1 (1.5%)
                Fractures
                  Fracture location                                                                                                                                                                   (n=63)
                        Middle 1/3 of tibia                                                                  41 (65.1%)
                       Middle 1/3 of fibula                                                                  22 (34.9%)
                        Distal 1/3 of tibia                                                                  19 (30.2%)
                        Proximal 1/3 of fibula                                                               15 (23.8%)
                        Distal 1/3 of fibula                                                                 10 (15.9%)
                        Proximal 1/3 of tibia                                                                 7 (11.0%)
                        Tibial plateau                                                                        3 (4.8%)
                        Calcaneus                                                                             2 (3.2%)
                  Gustilo-Anderson type                                                                                                                                                         (n = 56)
                       Type IIIB                                                                             35 (50.7%)
                        Type II                                                                              18 (26.1%)
                        Type IIIC                                                                             2 (2.9%)
                        Type I                                                                                1 (1.4%)


               increased use of locally-based perforator flaps , there appears to be less reliance on the aforementioned
                                                       [12]
               workhorse flap; however, it should not be overlooked as a reliable flap option for wounds involving the
               middle-third leg, as demonstrated by 0% flap loss. The muscle bulk recruited during flap elevation is well
               contoured for tibial coverage, providing added aesthetic benefit  for these injuries. Additionally, the soleus
                                                                     [5]
               flap is a relatively simple and safe alternative to more complex microsurgical reconstruction with free flap
               placement . Per operative dictation, indications for soleus flap placement were commonly weighed against
                        [12]
               free flap placement; however, wound size, ability to approximate the defect, surrounding tissue quality, and
               arc of rotation of the muscle belly prompted soleus flap selection. Reflective of the literature, soleus flaps
               were mostly selected for wounds involving the middle- and distal-third leg.


               The robust nature of the soleus flap is exemplified by 0% flap loss in our cohort, in which most patients
               endorsed comorbidities unfavorable to a free flap, namely tobacco use. Our cohort demonstrated a higher
               than expected incidence of overall infectious complications (17.6%); additionally, a significantly higher
               percentage of smokers developed infectious complications (83.3%, P = 0.017), which is reflective of the
   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66