Page 37 - Read Online
P. 37

significant higher rate of complications and revision rate   complications, and patient satisfaction with breast implants. Plast Reconstr
         in simultaneous  augmentation  with mastopexy  (Group B)   Surg 2006;117:757-67.
         as compared to augmentation mammoplasty alone (Group   10.  Khan UD. Vertical scar mastopexy with cat’s tail extension for prevention
                                                                 of skin redundancy: an experience with 17 consecutive cases after
         A). However, the overall  revision rate in simultaneous   mastopexy and mastopexy with breast augmentation. Aesthetic Plast Surg
         augmentation with mastopexy was  lower is actually a total   2012;36:303-7.
         sum of its two individual and distinct component and not   11.  Stevens WG, Stoker DA, Freeman ME, Quardt SM, Hirsch EM, Cohen R. Is
         exponential.                                            one-stage breast augmentation with mastopexy safe and effective? A review
                                                                 of 186 primary cases. Aesthet Surg J 2006;26:674-81.
         Financial support and sponsorship                   12.  Discussion. A 15-year experience with primary breast augmentation. Plast
                                                                 Reconstr Surg 2011;127:1301-13.
         Nil.                                                13.  Spear  S. Augmentation/mastopexy: “surgeon,  beware”.  Plast Reconstr Surg
                                                                 2003;112:905-6.
         Conflicts of interest                               14.  Spear SL, Pelliere CV, Menon N. One-stage augmentation combined with
         There are no conflicts of interest.                     mastopexy: aesthetic  results  and  patient satisfaction.  Aesthetic  Plast Surg
                                                                 2004;28:259-67.
                                                             15.  Stevens WG, Macias  LH, Spring M, Stoker DA, Chacón  CO, Eberlin SA.
         REFERENCES                                              One-stage augmentation mastopexy: a review of 1192 simultaneous breast
                                                                 augmentation  and  mastopexy  procedures in 615 consecutive patients.
         1.   The American Society for Aesthetic Plastic  Surgery’s  Cosmetic  Surgery   Aesthet Surg J 2014;34:723-32.
            National Data Bank: Statistics; 2013. Available from: http://www.surgery.org/  16.  Khan  UD.  Breast  augmentation,  antibiotic prophylaxis,  and  infection:
            media/statistics. [Last accessed on 2015 Oct 09].    comparative analysis of 1,628 primary augmentation  mammoplasties
         2.   Khan  UD. Secondary augmentation  mammoplasties  and  periprosthetic   assessing the role and effi cacy of antibiotic prophylaxis duration. Aesthetic
            infection: a three-year retrospective review. Aesthet Surg J 2012;32:465-73.  Plast Surg 2010;34:42-7.
         3.   Tebbetts JB. Achieving a zero percent reoperation rate at 3 years in a   17.  Khan UD. Augmentation mastopexy in muscle-splitting biplane: outcome of
            50-consecutive-case augmentation mammoplasty premarket approval study.   fi rst 44 consecutive cases of mastopexies in a new pocket. Aesthetic Plast
            Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;118:1453-7.                 Surg 2010;34:313-21.
         4.   Khan UD. The impact of preoperative breast implant selection on the 3-year   18.  Calobrace  MB, Herdt DR, Cothron  KJ. Simultaneous  augmentation/
            reoperation rate. Eur J Plast Surg 2013;36:503-10.   mastopexy: a  retrospective 5-year  review of  332 consecutive cases.  Plast
         5.   Cunningham B.  The mentor core study on silicone memorygel breast   Reconstr Surg 2013;131:145-56.
            implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007;120:19S-29S.  19.  Swanson E. Prospective comparative clinical evaluation of 784 consecutive
         6.   Mentor  Corporation. Saline Filled Breast  Implant Surgery: Making  an   cases  of  breast  augmentation  and  vertical   mammoplasty,  performed
            informed Decision. Mentor Corp, Santa Barbara, Calif. Available from: http://  individually and in a combination. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013;132:30e-45e.
            www.  mentorwwllc.com/pdf/fi  nalinformedconsent.pdf.  [Last  accessed  on   20.  Khan UD. Selection of breast pocket using pinch test in augmentation
            2015 Sep 09].                                        mammoplasty: can it be relied in long term? Aesthetic Plast Surg 2009;33:780-1.
         7.   Heden P, Bone B, Murphy DK, Slicton A, Walker PS. Style 410 cohesive silicone   21.  Spear SL, Boehmler JH 4th, Clemens MW. Augmentation/mastopexy: a 3-year
            breast implants: safety and effectiveness at 5 to 9 years after implantation.   review of a single surgeon’s practice. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;118:136S-47S.
            Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;118:1281-7.             22.  Mugea TT, Schifmann  MA. Aesthetic Surgery of  the Brest. 1st ed. Berlin,
         8.   Khan  UD.  Muscle-splitting,  subglandular  and  partial  submuscular   Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2015. p. 649-56.
            augmentation  mammoplasties: a 12-year retrospective  analysis of 2026   23.  Stevens WG, Freeman ME, Stoker DA, Quardt SM, Cohen R, Hirsch EM.
            primary cases. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2013;37:290-302.  One-stage mastopexy with breast augmentation: a review of 321 patients.
         9.   Handel N, Cordray T, Gutierrez J, Jensen JA. A long-term study of outcomes,   Plast Reconstr Surg 2007;120:1674-9.





































         30                                                                   Plast Aesthet Res || Vol 3 || Issue 1 || Jan 15, 2016
   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42