Page 18 - Read Online
P. 18

Sciegienka et al. Plast Aesthet Res 2022;9:1  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2021.76  Page 13 of 14

               roll due to the possibility of retraction and lip deformity after healing. Full-thickness defects can often be
               closed primarily if they involve less than one-third of the width of the lower lip. Larger defects often
               necessitate the use of local flaps. Rearrangement of lip tissue utilizing advancement flap techniques such as
               the Karapandzic flap or pedicled flap techniques such as the Abbe and Estlander flaps allow for the
               replacement of like tissue with like tissue. However, in cases where existing lip structure is lacking to the
               point that more distant tissue must be recruited, options such as the perialar crescentic advancement flap
               are useful. Mucosal advancement flaps are often used in conjunction with local skin flaps to reconstruct the
               mucosal  components  of  multilaminar,  full-thickness  defects.  The  rotational  flap  most  utile  for
               reconstruction is the inferiorly based melolabial flap which has been described in a previous section.


               CONCLUSION
               Facial reconstruction requires careful consideration of the unique qualities of each facial subunit and the
               corresponding advantages and risks of each type of reconstructive option. Often, local skin flaps provide the
               best result with the least morbidity. As described, rotation and transposition flaps can be utilized
               successfully for facial reconstruction when the flap is chosen correctly and is well designed and executed.


               DECLARATIONS
               Authors’ contributions
               Made substantial contributions to conception and design of the study and performed data review and
               drafted the manuscript text and created the figures: Sciegienka S
               Made substantial contributions to conception and design of the study and performed data review and edits
               of manuscript: Hanick A
               Made substantial contributions to conception and design of the study and provided insights and final edits
               to the manuscript: Branham G


               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.


               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.


               Conflicts of interest
               All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.

               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               Not applicable.

               Consent for publication
               Dr. Gregory Branham (corresponding author) has given permission to use the figures.

               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2022.

               REFERENCES
               1.       Branham GH. Principles of flap design and preoperative analysis. In: Branham G, Thomas JR, editors. Facial soft tissue
                   reconstruction: Thomas procedures in facial plastic surgery. Shelton, CT: People’s Medical Pub. House; 2011. p. 31-51.
               2.       Baker SR. Rotation flaps. Local flaps in facial reconstruction. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier/Saunders; 2014. p. 100-23.
               3.       Earnest LM, Byrne PJ. Scalp reconstruction. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2005;13:345-53, vii.  DOI  PubMed
               4.       Branham GH. Forehead and Brow Reconstruction. In: Branham G, Thomas JR, editors. Facial soft tissue reconstruction: Thomas
                   procedures in facial plastic surgery. Shelton, CT: People’s Medical Pub. House; 2011. p. 89-96.
   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23