Page 69 - Read Online
P. 69

Page 6 of 11                                       Diamond et al. Plast Aesthet Res 2019;6:20  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2019.26

               Table 1. Patient characteristics and univariate comparison based on the presence of osteomyelitis
                                                  Osteomyelitis n = 20  No osteomyelitis n = 39  P-value
               Age                                    51.95 ± 13.65        52.3 ± 13.44     0.918
               Sex (%)                                                                      0.192
                  Male                                18 (90)              29 (74.4)
                  Female                              2 (10)               10 (25.6)
               BMI                                    31.53 ± 6.80         28.10 ± 4.71     0.026
               Smoking history (%)                    6 (30.0)             17 (43.6)        0.311
               Hypertension (%)                       9 (45.0)             10 (25.6)        0.132
               Diabetes (%)                           9 (45.0)             13 (33.3)        0.380
               Coronary artery disease (%)            5 (25.0)             3 (7.7)          0.106
               Peripheral artery disease (%)          6 (30.0)             9 (23.1)         0.563
               Renal disease (%)                      1 (5.0)              3 (7.07)         1.000
               Malnourished (Albumin < 3.5 g/dL) (%)  6 (30.0)             5 (12.8)         0.159
               Multiple comorbidities (%)             10 (50.0)            23 59.0)         0.511
               Preoperative antithrombotic use (%)    20 (100.0)           38 (97.4)        1.000
               Preoperative antiplatelet use (%)      12 (60.0)            27 (69.2)        0.478
               Chemotherapy (%)                       1 (5.0)              3 (7.7)          1.000
               Radiation (%)                          1 (5.0)              3 (7.7)          1.000
               Prior revascularization (open or endovascular) (%)  6 (30.0)  3 (7.7)        0.050
               Vascular imaging (%)                   13 (65.0)            22 (56.4)        0.525
               Prior amputation level (%)             2 (10.0)             0 (0.0)          0.111


               Table 2. Wound, flap and anastomotic characteristics with univariate comparison between groups of patients based on the
               presence of osteomyelitis
                                   No.     %      Osteomyelitis (n = 20)  No osteomyelitis (n = 39)  P-value
               Type of wound (%)                                                             
                  Traumatic        30     50.8         7 (35.0)             23 (59.0)       0.081
                  Malignant        5      8.5          0 (0.0)              5 (12.8)        0.156
                  Chronic (> 90-day)  24  40.7         13 (65.0)            11 (28.2)       0.006
               Wound location                                                                
                  Foot             24     40.7         8 (40.0)             16 (41.0)       0.939
                  Ankle            14     23.7         5 (25.0)             9 (23.1)        1.000
                  Calf             13     22.0         4 (20.0)             9 (23.1)        1.000
                  Shin             3      5.1          1 (5.0)              2 (5.1)         1.000
                  Knee             4      6.8          2 (10.0)             2 (5.1)         0.598
                  Thigh            1      1.7          0 (0.0)              1 (2.55)        0.544
               Flap type
                  Superthin        17     28.8         8 (40.0)             9 (23.1)        0.174
                  Suprafascial     25     42.4         8 (40.0)             17 (43.6)       0.792
                  Subfascial       17     28.8         4 (20.0)             13 (33.3)       0.284
               Anastomosis
                  End to End       42     76.4        15 (75.0)             27 (77.1)       1.000
                  End to Side      13     23.6        5 (25.0)              8 (22.9)        1.000


               were elevated in three major planes: superthin (17 patients, 29%), suprafascial (25 patients, 42%) and
               subfascial (17 patients, 29%). Twenty patients (34%) had tissue-proven osteomyelitis. When separated into
               groups based on the presence of osteomyelitis, patients were well-matched across 116 variables. Select
               comparisons are shown in Table 1. Individuals with osteomyelitis had higher average BMI (P = 0.03) and a
               greater incidence of previous vascular interventions (P = 0.05).


               Table 2 describes wound characteristics and locations. Traumatic injury was the most common type of
               wound etiology in both osteomyelitis and non-osteomyelitis groups (51%) followed by chronic wound and
               malignant wounds (40% and 9%, respectively). Chronic wounds were defined as an established wound
               despite attempts at local or surgical wound care, offloading, and medical comorbidity management past 90-
               days. The foot and ankle were the most common recipient site for the ALT flaps. The distributions of ALT
               thickness type across osteomyelitis as well as non-osteomyelitis groups were comparable.
   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74