Page 74 - Read Online
P. 74

Page 14 of 15            Tang et al. Plast Aesthet Res 2024;11:61  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2024.117

               transferred except for one patient who had delayed necrosis of the augmentation flap requiring debridement
               at two months postoperatively. In addition, we found one case of abdominal donor site infection that was
               treated with oral antibiotics, one case of a hematoma on the augmentation side requiring surgical washout,
               one case of a hematoma on the reconstructive side that did not require operative intervention, and one
               patient with delayed wound healing of bilateral breasts and abdominal donor site. Reports in the literature
               on DIEP flaps have indicated an increased risk of abdominal bulge and hernia with the use of lateral row
               perforators . Complications  relating  to  post-mastectomy  radiation  can  be  detrimental  from  a
                         [11]
               reconstructive standpoint, causing loss of volume, distortion of the reconstructed breast shape, and
               tightening of the skin envelope. Thus, for patients with any possibility of needing post-mastectomy
               radiation, we recommend tissue expander placement at the time of mastectomy and pursue reconstruction
               in a delayed fashion at least six months following completion of radiation.


               SUMMARY WITH SOME KEY POINTS
               In select patients undergoing unilateral mastectomy and autologous breast reconstruction who desire
               augmentation of the contralateral breast, unilateral breast reconstruction with contralateral augmentation
               can be safely and reliably achieved with DIEP flaps. This technique is ideal for patients who desire to avoid
               implants and who have adequate lower abdominal tissue.


               Preoperative planning with CTA is helpful for mapping out the course of the perforators, calculating the
               anticipated volume of the reconstructed and the augmented breast, and designing the anticipated divide
               between the larger flap for reconstruction and the smaller flap for augmentation. Perforator selection is
               based on the volume needed for each flap, length of pedicle required, location of perforators, and ease of
               perforator dissection to minimize abdominal morbidity. Augmentation flaps can be completely buried in
               the subangular plane or include a small skin paddle for monitoring which can be excised at a secondary
               procedure. Overall, unilateral breast reconstruction with contralateral autologous augmentation is
               associated with high levels of patient satisfaction.


               DECLARATIONS
               Authors’ contributions
               Contributed to the writing of the manuscript: Tang SYQ
               Contributed to the clinical cases and the writing of the manuscript: Kung TA, Momoh AO


               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.


               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.


               Conflicts of interest
               All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.

               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               Approval by the review board is not applicable. Written informed consent for participation was obtained
               from all subjects.

               Consent for publication
               Written informed consent was obtained from patients for publication.
   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79