Page 10 - Read Online
P. 10

Sarrami et al. Plast Aesthet Res 2024;11:13  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2024.06  Page 5 of 15






















                Figure 4. (A) Identification of inguinal lymph nodes; (B) Harvested inguinal lymph node flap; (C) Vascularized inguinal lymph node
                anastomosis to axillary blood supply.

               Benefits
               In addition to its early promising results, the DIEP flap with inguinal lymph nodes has many added benefits
                       [1]
               [Figure 5] . The flap size allows for adequate aesthetic reconstruction and easy lymph node insertion into
               the axilla. Nguyen et al. report the utility of a hemi-abdominal flap which can be designed for patients
                                                                           [16]
               undergoing bilateral reconstruction or have a prior midline incision . Lastly, the DIEP flap has a very
               reliable vascular supply which has a low failure rate and has repeatedly shown good perfusion of the
               inguinal nodes .
                            [8]

               Pitfalls
               In addition to the risks associated with the DIEP flap alone, the VLNT flap also presents complications .
                                                                                                       [27]
               Inguinal lymph node anastomosis to the thoracodorsal artery ensures a strong vascular supply but disrupts
               the pedicle to the latissimus dorsi flap. This sacrifices the latissimus dorsi as a future lifeboat for breast
                                                                                          [5,7]
               reconstruction and is another reason some choose not to construct a bipedicle flap . Inguinal node
               dissection also results in hollowing of the groin, which can complicate abdominal site closure. This is
               generally well addressed using local tissue advancement . In the clinical studies previously discussed, donor
                                                              [8]
               site complications occurred in 14%-22% of patients. The most common complication was seroma formation
               and was treated conservatively [16,25,26] . As with all VLNT flaps, there is a risk of donor site lymphedema, but
               very few reports of lower extremity lymphedema have been documented with the use of reverse lymphatic
               mapping [Table 2] .
                               [5]
               Latissimus dorsi flap with lateral thoracic lymph nodes
               A growing number of studies have reported success using the latissimus dorsi (LD) flap in conjunction with
               a lateral thoracic lymph node transfer [4,28] . Becker et al. first introduced the idea of a thoracodorsal artery
               perforator flap, which was then popularized by Inbal et al. . This technique has been described as both a
                                                                 [4,7]
               pedicled flap for BCRL management and a free flap for distant lymphatic defects like the groin and lower
               extremity [5,7,11] .


               Technical conisderations
               The chimeric flap is designed more anterior than the classic LD flap . This positioning captures the
                                                                             [4]
               majority of lymph nodes which sit around the mid-axillary line [Figure 6A]. In 60% of cases, the lateral
               thoracic vessels perfuse the lymph nodes located at the superior border of the muscle. In the other 40% of
               people, the lymph nodes are located at the distal end of the thoracodorsal vessel and supplied by the serratus
               anterior branches . ICG lymphography prior to surgical incision is useful to insure the availability of lymph
                              [7]
   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15