Page 11 - Read Online
P. 11

Page 6 of 15            Sarrami et al. Plast Aesthet Res 2024;11:13  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2024.06

               Table 2. Surgical options for autologous breast reconstruction with vascularized lymph node transfer
                                                                                             Donor site
                                Outcomes             Benefits            Pitfalls
                                                                                             lymphedema
                                                                                                [29]
                DIEP flap with inguinal   Mean volume reduction: 10%-  Reliable vascular supply to   Bipedicle flap design   1.6%
                nodes           31% [16,25]          flap and lymph nodes   Donor site hollowing wound
                                                                                       [16,26]
                                Discontinuation of compression  Large amount of soft tissue   breakdown: 16%-20%
                                therapy: 40%-60% [25,26]    for breast reconstruction  Donor site seroma: 2%-
                                                                           [16,25,26]
                                Reduction of physiotherapy:              12%
                                       [25,26]
                                60%-100%
                LD Flap with lateral   Mean volume reduction: 44.4%- Pedicled flap design  High overall complication rate:  13.2% [29]
                thoracic nodes  48% [4,28]                               18.4% [29]
                                                                         Lymphocele: 2.5% [29]
                                                                                                [29]
                SCIP Flap with inguinal   Discontinuation of compression  Flap harvest does not invade   Overall complication rate:   1.6%
                nodes           therapy (n = 1): 100% [32]    underlying fascia   10.9% [29]
                                Discontinuation of                       Lymphocele or seroma:
                                physiotherapy (n = 3): 100% [26]         7.7% [29]
                                Change in quality-of-life score*
                                (n = 3): 2% [25,26]
                                                                                               [29,45]
                Vascularized omentum   Mean volume reduction (n = 7):  No disruption of donor site      0%
                                      [44]
                lymphatic transfer  0%-77%           lymphatic drainage  Intra-abdominal surgery
                                                                         Risk of ileus (2.2%), transient
                                                                                    [45]
                                                                         pancreatitis (1.1%)
               DIEP: deep inferior epigastric perforator; LD: latissimus dorsi; SCIP: superficial circumflex iliac perforator; *: Quality-of-life assessed using Upper
               Limb Lymphedema-27 Questionnaire
                Figure 5. Preoperative (right) and postoperative (left) images of DIEP flap breast reconstruction with inguinal lymph nodes for the
                breast cancer patient with a history of upper extremity lymphedema. DIEP: deep inferior epigastric perforator.























                Figure 6. (A) Preoperative markings of the latissimus dorsi flap with lateral thoracic nodes made around the mid-axillary line; (B) ICG
                lymphography is used to design the flap around healthy lateral thoracic nodes. ICG: indocyanine green.

               nodes in the vicinity of the flap [Figure 6B] . Flap harvest can be muscle-sparing, though larger defects
                                                     [4,5]
               may require further muscle dissection to provide appropriate volume . The adipolymphatic tissue is
                                                                             [4,7]
               harvested anterior to the LD but should remain inferior to the pectoral muscle border [Figure 7]. Limiting
               lymphatic harvest to level 1 nodes protects lymph drainage of the arm . Reverse mapping of the upper
                                                                             [7]
                                         [18]
               extremity could also be used . Finally, the surgeon should ensure adequate scar release prior to flap
               rotation and lymph node positioning in the axilla.
   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16