Page 14 - Read Online
P. 14

Zheng et al. Neuroimmunol Neuroinflammation 2019;6:1  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-8659.2018.52               Page 9 of 12


               reverse the M1-like pro-inflammatory effect after SAH. Clinical trials are essential to provide the advanced
               evidence for their therapeutic effect. With the expanding investigation of microglial polarization and function,
               the treatment that targets microglial phenotype switching may be an efficient approach for SAH therapy.


               CONCLUSION
               Microglial activation is an important pathological mechanism in the progression of SAH. Microglia undergo
               polarization into mainly M1 and M2 phenotypes contributing differently to neuroinflammation after SAH.
               These results indicate the presence of M1-related pro-inflammatory state early after SAH. While microglia
               polarize to M2 phenotype gradually on delayed phase. Although the dynamics of microglial polarization
               specifically after SAH remain to be defined, modulation of microglial activation is expected to enhance the
               tissue repair and functional recovery. The transition from M1 to M2 polarization is thought to be a target
               concerning the amelioration of the pro-inflammatory response. The investigation on the applications of
               microglia-targeted treatments is expected to improve our understanding of the pathogenesis of SAH and
               lead to potential therapeutic strategies for affected patients.


               DECLARATIONS
               Authors’ contributions
               Formulation of the key concepts and manuscript framework, literature research, manuscript draft and
               editing: Zheng ZV
               Formulation of the key concepts and manuscript framework, manuscript revision: Wong GKC

               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.

               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.


               Conflicts of interest
               All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.

               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               Not applicable.

               Consent for publication
               Not applicable.

               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2019.


               REFERENCES
               1.   van Gijn J, Kerr RS, Rinkel GJ. Subarachnoid haemorrhage. Lancet 2007;369:306-18.
               2.   Wong GK, Lam S, Ngai K, Wong A, Mok V, et al. Evaluation of cognitive impairment by the Montreal cognitive assessment in patients
                   with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: prevalence, risk factors and correlations with 3 month outcomes. J Neurol Neurosurg
                   Psychiatry 2012;83:1112-7.
               3.   Longstreth WT, Nelson LM, Koepsell TD, van Belle G. Clinical course of spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage: a population-based
                   study in King County, Washington. Neurology 1993;43:712-8.
               4.   Chen S, Wu H, Tang J, Zhang J, Zhang JH. Neurovascular events after subarachnoid hemorrhage: focusing on subcellular organelles.
                   Acta Neurochir Suppl 2015;120:39-46.
               5.   Vergouwen MD, Ilodigwe D, Macdonald RL. Cerebral Infarction after subarachnoid hemorrhage contributes to poor outcome by
                   vasospasm-dependent and -independent effects. Stroke 2011;42:924-9.
               6.   Dankbaar JW, Rijsdijk M, van der Schaaf IC, Velthuis BK, Wermer MJ, et al. Relationship between vasospasm, cerebral perfusion, and
   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19