Page 197 - Read Online
P. 197
Page 10 of 11 Kolokotronis et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2021;5:19 https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2021.07
Visceral, Vascular, Pediatric and Transplantation Surgery, 66421 Homburg, Germany, is cordially thanked
for providing supervision for Dr. T. Kolokotronis doctoral thesis and giving his permission to collect data.
Authors’ contributions
The first author: Kolokotronis T
The last author: Galanis M
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.
Financial support and sponsorship
None.
Conflicts of interest
Both authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.
Ethical approval and consent to participate
This publication is part of the doctoral thesis of Kolokotronis T with the title: “Postoperative outcome and
overall survival after surgery for esophageal cancer; a retrospective, single- center experience of 320 patients
encompassing 14 years”.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2021.
REFERENCES
1. Vigneswaran WT, Trastek VF, Pairolero PC, Deschamps C, Daly RC, Allen MS. Transhiatal esophagectomy for carcinoma of the
esophagus. Ann Thorac Surg 1993;56:838-44; discussion 44. DOI
2. Agrawal S, Deshmukh SP, Patil PK, et al. Intrathoracic anastomosis after oesophageal resection for cancer. J Surg Oncol 1996;63:52-
6. DOI PubMed
3. Ercan S, Rice TW, Murthy SC, Rybicki LA, Blackstone EH. Does esophagogastric anastomotic technique influence the outcome of
patients with esophageal cancer? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005;129:623-31. DOI PubMed
4. Martin LW, Swisher SG, Hofstetter W, et al. Intrathoracic leaks following esophagectomy are no longer associated with increased
mortality. Ann Surg 2005;242:392-9; discussion 9. DOI PubMed PMC
5. Urschel JD, Blewett CJ, Bennett WF, Miller JD, Young JE. Handsewn or stapled esophagogastric anastomoses after esophagectomy
for cancer: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Dis Esophagus 2001;14:212-7. DOI PubMed
6. Kassis ES, Kosinski AS, Ross P Jr. , Koppes KE, Donahue JM, Daniel VC. Predictors of anastomotic leak after esophagectomy: an
analysis of the society of thoracic surgeons general thoracic database. Ann Thorac Surg 2013;96:1919-26. DOI
7. Goense L, van Rossum PSN, Weijs TJ, et al. Aortic Calcification Increases the Risk of Anastomotic Leakage After Ivor-Lewis
Esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2016;102:247-52. DOI PubMed
8. Michelet P, D'Journo XB, Roch A, et al. Perioperative risk factors for anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy: influence of thoracic
epidural analgesia. Chest 2005;128:3461-6. DOI PubMed
9. Schilling M, Buchler MW. Fundus rotation gastroplasty. Dig Surg 1999;16:175-7. DOI PubMed
10. Gooszen JAH, Goense L, Gisbertz SS, Ruurda JP, van Hillegersberg R, van Berge Henegouwen MI. Intrathoracic versus cervical
anastomosis and predictors of anastomotic leakage after oesophagectomy for cancer. Br J Surg 2018;105:552-60. DOI PubMed PMC
11. Klink CD, Binnebosel M, Otto J, et al. Intrathoracic versus cervical anastomosis after resection of esophageal cancer: a matched pair
analysis of 72 patients in a single center study. World J Surg Oncol 2012;10:159. DOI PubMed PMC
12. Ribet M, Debrueres B, Lecomte-Houcke M. Resection for advanced cancer of the thoracic esophagus: cervical or thoracic
anastomosis? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1992;103:784-9. PubMed
13. Walther B, Johansson J, Johnsson F, Von Holstein CS, Zilling T. Cervical or thoracic anastomosis after esophageal resection and
gastric tube reconstruction: a prospective randomized trial comparing sutured neck anastomosis with stapled intrathoracic anastomosis.
Ann Surg 2003;238:803-12; discussion 12. DOI PubMed PMC
14. Okuyama M, Motoyama S, Suzuki H, Saito R, Maruyama K, Ogawa J. Hand-sewn cervical anastomosis versus stapled intrathoracic