Page 879 - Read Online
P. 879

Ghuman et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2020;4:84                     Mini-invasive Surgery
               DOI: 10.20517/2574-1225.2020.88




               Review                                                                        Open Access


               Robotic or laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer -
               which is the best answer? A comprehensive review

               of oncological outcomes


               Amandeep Ghuman, Sandra Kavalukas, Steven D. Wexner

               Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL 33331, USA.

               Correspondence to: Dr. Steven D. Wexner, Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL 33331, USA.
               E-mail: wexners@ccf.org
               How to cite this article: Ghuman A, Kavalukas S, Wexner SD. Robotic or laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer - which is the best
               answer? A comprehensive review of oncological outcomes. Mini-invasive Surg 2020;4:84.
               http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2020.88

               Received: 15 Sep 2020    First Decision: 30 Oct 2020    Revised: 2 Nov 2020    Accepted: 6 Nov 2020    Published: 20 Nov 2020
               Academic Editor: Sergio W. Larach    Copy Editor: Cai-Hong Wang    Production Editor: Jing Yu



               Abstract
               Treatment of rectal cancer is ever evolving with the introduction of newer surgical technologies and multimodal
               treatment approach. The literature evaluating the various surgical treatment options with regards to operative and
               nonoperative outcomes is abundant. This is a comprehensive review focused on oncological outcomes of rectal
               cancer resection performed robotically or laparoscopically. Based on the current literature available, there is no
               significant difference in total mesorectal excision completeness, lymph node harvest, positive circumferential
               resection margin, or proximal resection margin between robotic and laparoscopic approaches for rectal resection.
               Selection of surgical approach should not be based on pathological outcomes as they are equivalent.

               Keywords: Robotic, robotics, laparoscopic, laparoscopy, rectal cancer, rectal carcinoma, total mesorectal excision





               INTRODUCTION
               The treatment of rectal cancer has evolved during the last several decades into a multidisciplinary
               model of care. During this time, surgical innovations continued to revolutionize treatment and improve
                                                                                                        [1]
               patient outcomes, most notably the introduction of total mesorectal excision (TME) by Heald et al. .
               This landmark discovery changed the trajectory of rectal cancer resections and greatly improved patient
               outcomes by reducing pelvic recurrences. Since that time, laparoscopic TME was introduced and has


                           © The Author(s) 2020. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
                           International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use,
                sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, for any purpose, even commercially, as long
                as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license,
                and indicate if changes were made.


                                                                                                                                                     www.misjournal.net
   874   875   876   877   878   879   880   881   882   883   884