Page 884 - Read Online
P. 884

Page 6 of 6                                   Ghuman et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2020;4:84  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2020.88

               13.  Eltair M, Hajibandeh S, Hajibandeh S, et al. Meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal
                   excision in management of rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 2020;35:1423-38.
               14.  Simillis C, Lal N, Thoukididou SN, et al. Open versus laparoscopic versus robotic versus transanal mesorectal excision for rectal cancer:
                   a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2019;270:59-68.
               15.  Rausa E, Bianco F, Kelly ME, et al. Systemic review and network meta-analysis comparing minimal surgical techniques for rectal cancer:
                   quality of total mesorectum excision, pathological, surgical, and oncological outcomes. J Surg Oncol 2019;119:987-98.
               16.  Milone M, Manigrasso M, Velotti N, et al. Completeness of total mesorectum excision of laparoscopic versus robotic surgery: a review
                   with a meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2019;34:983-91.
               17.  Compton CC, Greene FL. The staging of colorectal cancer: 2004 and beyond. CA Cancer J Clin 2004;54:295-308.
               18.  Compton CC, Fielding LP, Burgart LJ, et al. Prognostic factors in colorectal cancer. College of American Pathologists Consensus
                   Statement 1999. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2000;124:979-94.
               19.  Sobin LH, Greene FL. TNM classification: clarification of number of regional lymph nodes for pn0. Cancer 2001;92:452.
               20.  Park JS, Kim NK, Kim SH, et al. Korean Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group. Multicentre study of robotic intersphincteric
                   resection for low rectal cancer. Br J Surg 2015;102:1567-73.
               21.  Kim J, Baek SJ, Kang DW, et al. Robotic resection is a good prognostic factor in rectal cancer compared with laparoscopic resection:
                   long-term survival analysis using propensity score matching. Dis Colon Rectum 2017;60:266-73.
               22.  Panteleimonitis S, Pickering O, Abbas H, et al. Robotic rectal cancer surgery in obese patients may lead to better short-term outcomes
                   when compared to laparoscopy: a comparative propensity scored match study. Int J Colorectal Dis 2018;33:1079-86.
               23.  Law WL, Foo DCC. Comparison of short-term and oncologic outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic resection for mid- and distal rectal
                   cancer. Surg Endosc 2017;31:2798-807.
               24.  Hoshino N, Sakamoto T, Hida K, Sakai Y. Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: an overview of systematic reviews with
                   quality assessment of current evidence. Surg Today 2019;49:556-70.
               25.  Gavriilidis P, Wheeler J, Spinelli A, de’Angelis N, Simopoulos C, Di Saverio S. Robotic vs laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for
                   rectal cancers: has a paradigm change occurred? A systematic review by updated meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis 2020; doi: 10.1111/
                   codi.15084.
               26.  Zheng B, Zhang X, Wang X, et al. A comparison of open, laparoscopic and robotic total mesorectal excision: trial sequential analysis and
                   network meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis 2020;22:382-91.
               27.  Liao G, Zhao Z, Deng H, Li X. Comparison of pathological outcomes between robotic rectal cancer surgery and laparoscopic rectal
                   cancer surgery: a meta-analysis based on seven randomized controlled trials. Int J Med Robot 2019;15:e2027.
               28.  Lee SH, Kim DH, Lim SW. Robotic versus laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-
                   analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2018;33:1741-53.
               29.  Kavalukas SL, Ghuman A, Sharp SP, Wexner SD. Robotic or laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer - which is the best answer? a
                   comprehensive review of non-oncological outcomes and learning curve. Mini-invasive Surg 2020;4:61.
               30.  American College of Surgeons. National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer. Available from: https://www.facs.org/quality-
                   programs/cancer/naprc#. [Last accessed on 9 Nov 2020]
               31.  Richardson B, Preskitt J, Lichliter W, et al. The effect of multidisciplinary teams for rectal cancer on delivery of care and patient outcome:
                   has the use of multidisciplinary teams for rectal cancer affected the utilization of available resources, proportion of patients meeting the
                   standard of care, and does this translate into changes in patient outcome? Am J Surg 2016;211:46-52.
               32.  Karagkounis G, Stocchi L, Lavery IC, et al. Multidisciplinary conference and clinical management of rectal cancer. J Am Coll Surg
                   2018;226:874-80.
   879   880   881   882   883   884   885   886   887   888   889