Page 874 - Read Online
P. 874

Cappabianca et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2020;4:83  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2020.67                          Page 7 of 11

               changed irradiation of these tumors and fractionated radiotherapy and radiosurgery have entered the
               armamentarium of modern neurosurgery. Advances in the molecular characterization of meningioma have
               enabled the identification of genetic alterations and methylation profiling subclasses that correlate with the
               likelihood of tumor recurrence and represent promising medical therapy targets [97,98] . Thus, genomics has
               altered the understanding of the molecular underpinnings of meningiomas, and ongoing clinical trials have
               the potential to alter how meningiomas are treated.

               The high local control rates with low morbidity achieved by radiation modalities and the surgical
               philosophy of maximal safe resection for meningiomas associated at higher risk of morbidity should guide
               the best treatment options in a patient-based and lesion-specific approach. Radiotherapy is currently
               adopted as first-line treatment for cavernous sinus meningiomas, due to increased complication and
               mortality rates associated to surgical resection [16,29] . For adjuvant radiotherapy, the goal of treatment is
               preventing progression to higher-grade malignancy and decreasing recurrence rate. In cases of grade
               II (atypical) and grade III (anaplastic/malignant) meningiomas, there is a substantially greater risk
               of recurrence and a clearer role for adjuvant radiotherapy, even following a gross total resection. It is
               important to note that recommendations for radiotherapy in different meningioma scenarios, coming from
               the European Association of Neuro-Oncology (EANO) and the Current National Comprehensive Cancer
               Network (NCCN), do not take into account tumor location or any molecular pathological markers, and
               both were published prior to the revised 2016 WHO classification, whose criteria may result in more WHO
               grade II meningiomas that would have been classified as grade I under the older criteria [16,99] .

               CONCLUSION
               The continuous evolution of the surgical techniques and, above all, the magnification of the surgical
               view provided by the endoscope have brought terrific contributions to the effectiveness of meningioma
               surgery. The most challenging task confronting modern meningioma surgery remains the selection of
               the most appropriate surgical approach: multiple factors including tumor size consistency and location,
               extent of dural attachment, and relation with neurovascular structures, along with surgeon’s preference
               and experience, should be taken in account. With the amount of support and guidance that current
               technologies and advances have provided, modern criteria for meningioma treatment should further
               consider the careful balance between the desired goal of meningioma surgical cure, and the patient’s
               neurological function preservation should guide the surgery. Improvements in radiation therapy modalities
               and advances in the molecular characterization of these tumors will further refine the criteria for the
               surgical approach to meningiomas.


               DECLARATIONS
               Authors’ contributions
               Made substantial contribution to conception of the study: Cappabianca P, Solari D
               Prepared the manuscript draft: d’Avella E
               Critically revised the final version of the manuscript: Cappabianca P, Cavallo LM

               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.

               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.

               Conflicts of interest
               All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.
   869   870   871   872   873   874   875   876   877   878   879