Page 875 - Read Online
P. 875

Page 8 of 11                           Cappabianca et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2020;4:83  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2020.67

               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               Not applicable.


               Consent for publication
               Not applicable.


               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2020.


               REFERENCES
               1.   DeMonte F, McDermott M, Al-Mefty O. Al-Mefty’s meningiomas. 2th ed. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers; 2011.
               2.   Lee JH. Meningiomas: diagnosis, treatement and outcome. London: Springer-Verlag; 2009.
               3.   Wiemels J, Wrensch M, Claus EB. Epidemiology and etiology of meningioma. J Neurooncol 2010;99:307-14.
               4.   Rogers L, Barani I, Chamberlain M, et al. Meningiomas: knowledge base, treatment outcomes, and uncertainties. A RANO review. J
                   Neurosurg 2015;122:4-23.
               5.   Louis DN, Perry A, Reifenberger G, et al. The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System:
                   a summary. Acta Neuropathol 2016;131:803-20.
               6.   Cushing H, Eisenhardt L. Meningiomas, their classification, regional behaviour, life history, and surgical end results. New York: Hafner;
                   1938.
               7.   Islim AI, Mohan M, Moon RDC, et al. Incidental intracranial meningiomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic factors
                   and outcomes. J Neurooncol 2019;142:211-21.
               8.   Watts J, Box G, Galvin A, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of meningiomas: a pictorial review. Insights Imaging 2014;5:113-22.
               9.   Tamrazi B, Shiroishi MS, Liu CS. Advanced imaging of intracranial meningiomas. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2016;27:137-43.
               10.  Hamerla G, Meyer HJ, Schob S, et al. Comparison of machine learning classifiers for differentiation of grade 1 from higher gradings in
                   meningioma: a multicenter radiomics study. Magn Reson Imaging 2019;63:244-9.
               11.  Zhu Y, Man C, Gong L, et al. A deep learning radiomics model for preoperative grading in meningioma. Eur J Radiol 2019;116:128-34.
               12.  Yasargil MG. Interfascial pterional (frontotemporosphenoidal) craniotomy. In: Yasargil MG editor. Microneurosurgery. Volume1.
                   Stuttgart: George Thieme Verlag; 1984. pp. 215-20.
               13.  Jane JA, Park TS, Pobereskin LH, Winn HR, Butler AB. The supraorbital approach: technical note. Neurosurgery 1982;11:537-42.
               14.  da Costa MDS, Hardesty DA, Priddy B, et al. Extended supraorbital approach with modified eyebrow incision: technical note. World
                   Neurosurg 2019;128:354-9.
               15.  de Divitiis E, Cavallo LM, Esposito F, Stella L, Messina A. Extended endoscopic transsphenoidal approach for tuberculum sellae
                   meningiomas. Neurosurgery 2007;61:229-37; discussion 237-8.
               16.  Goldbrunner R, Minniti G, Preusser M, et al. EANO guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of meningiomas. Lancet Oncol
                   2016;17:e383-91.
               17.  Zada G, Jensen RL. Meningiomas: an update on diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2016;27:xiii.
               18.  Cappabianca P, Solari D. Meningiomas of the skull base: treatment nuances in contemporary neurosurgery. New York: Thieme Medical
                   Publishers; 2018.
               19.  Rockhill J, Mrugala M, Chamberlain MC. Intracranial meningiomas: an overview of diagnosis and treatment. Neurosurg Focus
                   2007;23:E1.
               20.  SIMPSON D. The recurrence of intracranial meningiomas after surgical treatment. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1957;20:22-39.
               21.  Gousias K, Schramm J, Simon M. The Simpson grading revisited: aggressive surgery and its place in modern meningioma management.
                   J Neurosurg 2016;125:551-60.
               22.  Sughrue ME, Kane AJ, Shangari G, et al. The relevance of simpson grade I and II resection in modern neurosurgical treatment of World
                   Health Organization Grade I meningiomas. J Neurosurg 2010;113:1029-35.
               23.  Barber SM, Konakondla S, Nakhla J, et al. Oncologic benefits of dural resection in spinal meningiomas: a meta-analysis of Simpson
                   grades and recurrence rates. J Neurosurg Spine 2019;1-11.
               24.  Nanda A, Bir SC, Maiti TK, et al. Relevance of Simpson grading system and recurrence-free survival after surgery for World Health
                   Organization Grade I meningioma. J Neurosurg 2017;126:201-11.
               25.  Meling TR, Da Broi M, Scheie D, Helseth E. Meningiomas: skull base versus non-skull base. Neurosurg Rev 2019;42:163-73.
               26.  Voß KM, Spille DC, Sauerland C, et al. The Simpson grading in meningioma surgery: does the tumor location influence the prognostic
                   value? J Neurooncol 2017;133:641-51.
               27.  Savardekar AR, Patra DP, Bir S, et al. Differential tumor progression patterns in skull base versus non-skull base meningiomas: a critical
                   analysis from a long-term follow-up study and review of literature. World Neurosurg 2018;112:e74-83.
               28.  Voldřich R, Netuka D, Beneš V. Spinal meningiomas: is Simpson grade II resection radical enough? Acta Neurochir (Wien)
                   2020;162:1401-8.
               29.  Pollock BE, Stafford SL. Results of stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with imaging defined cavernous sinus meningiomas. Int J Radiat
                   Oncol Biol Phys 2005;62:1427-31.
   870   871   872   873   874   875   876   877   878   879   880