Page 718 - Read Online
P. 718

Masiero et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2020;4:71  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2020.56                                   Page 11 of 12

               [Videos 2 and 3]. When sufficient and straight leaflet insertion was confirmed, the clasps were dropped,
               and device was closed. Immediately after, the residual MR and transvalvular gradient were systematically
               assessed to confirm optimal MR reduction before final deployment [Figures 5 and 6] [Video 4].
               Remarkably, a drop in the mean left-atrial pressure from 16 to 8 mmHg was observed. Mild regurgitation
               was confirmed at TTE before discharge (in particular: residual mean MV gradient of 3 mmHg, effective
                                  2
                                                      2
               orifice area of 14 mm  and MV area of 3 cm ) [Figure 7] and at 30-days follow-up with acceptable mitral
               gradient and clinical improvement (NYHA class I-II).
               CONCLUSION
               The percutaneous treatment of functional MR through transcatheter “edge-to-edge” leaflet repair has
               recently risen as a viable and safe alternative to conventional surgery in selected patients with severe disease
               who remain symptomatic despite maximally tolerated guideline-directed medical therapy and judged at
               high surgical risk by a multidisciplinary and experienced heart team. Two devices are currently available,
               the MitraClip and the PASCAL Repair Systems, with peculiar technical aspects and evidence.


               DECLARATIONS
               Authors’ contributions
               Participated to the conception and the drafting of the manuscript, its critical revision for important
               intellectual content and the final approval of the submitted text; agreement for all aspects of the work
               ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately
               investigated and resolved: Masiero G, Rodinò G, Tarantini G

               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.


               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.

               Conflicts of interest
               Tarantini G reports honoraria for lectures from Abbott Vascular and Edwards Lifesciences; Masiero G and
               Rodinò G declared that there are no conflicts of interest.


               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               Not applicable.


               Consent for publication
               Not applicable.


               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2020.

               REFERENCES
               1.   Baumgartner H, Falk V, Bax JJ, De Bonis M, Hamm C, et al; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the
                   management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J 2017;38:2739-91.
               2.   Ennezat PV, Maréchaux S, Pibarot P, Le Jemtel TH. Secondary mitral regurgitation in heart failure with reduced or preserved left
                   ventricular ejection fraction. Cardiology 2013;125:110-7.
               3.   Inciardi RM, Rossi A, Benfari G, Cicoira M. Fill in the gaps of secondary mitral regurgitation: a continuum challenge from
                   pathophysiology to prognosis. Curr Heart Fail Rep 2018;15:106-15.
               4.   Iung B, Vahanian A. Prevalence and definition of secondary mitral regurgitation. In: Fattouch K, Lancellotti P, Angelini GD, editors.
                   Secondary Mitral Valve Regurgitation. London: Springer; 2015. pp. 1-6.
   713   714   715   716   717   718   719   720   721   722   723