Page 286 - Read Online
P. 286

Page 10 of 11                                Serra-Aracil et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2019;3:37  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2019.36

               The etiology of this asymptomatic fever is not known, although it is probably caused by an inflammatory
               reaction to the surgical aggression rather than to a self-limited infection or contamination; in all cases, it
               was controlled with antipyretics. We do not consider it as postoperative complication.

               Severe perianal infection and the need for colostomy
               The removal of lesions in the rectum, with fecal contamination of the resection area, entails a high risk
               of developing serious and frequent pelvic infections. Infections are very rare (in our study, only seven
               (1%) cases were recorded) but they can be serious. When they appear, antibiotic treatment and local
               debridement should be applied as quickly as possible to avoid the need for more radical treatments. Two
               of these patients required an end colostomy: one an immunosuppressed patient with a lymphoma, and the
               other without associated morbidity.

               The limitations of this study are those inherent in observational studies performed at a single center. Its
               main strength is the unusually large sample size. All the data reported were recorded prospectively over a
               period of 15 years; the experience gathered over this time has allowed us to discuss and establish protocols
               for responding to the different complications.

               In conclusion, clinically relevant complications after TEM are rare occurrences. Nonetheless, a protocol for
               their management needs to be established to ensure that their importance is not underestimated, and to
               avoid unnecessary or excessively aggressive treatments.


               DECLARATIONS
               Acknowledgments
               We thank the rest of the members of the Coloproctology Unit for applying the study protocol. We thank
               Cristina Gomez Vigo for correcting the manuscript and Michael Maudsley for helping with the English.


               Authors’ contributions
               Made substantial contributions to conception and design of the study and performed data analysis and
               interpretation: Serra-Aracil X, Mora-López L, Pallisera-Lloveras A, Serra-Pla S
               Performed data acquisition and provided administrative, technical, and material support: Garcia-Nalda A,
               Gil-Barrionuevo E, Navarro-Soto S


               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.


               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.


               Conflicts of interest
               All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.

               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               The present study was approved by the Local Institutional Ethics Committee (CEIC: 2016-636), and
               complied with the criteria of the Declaration of Helsinki. The STROBE guidelines for observational studies
               were followed.

               Consent for publication
               Not applicable.
   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291