Page 152 - Read Online
P. 152

Page 10 of 10                                 de Pascale et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2019;3:18  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2019.04

               12.   van Workum F, Berkelmans GH, Klarenbeek BR, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Luyer MDP, et al. McKeown or Ivor Lewis totally
                   minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction: systematic review and meta-analysis.
                   2017;9:S826-33.
               13.   Degisors S1, Pasquer A, Renaud F, Béhal H, Hec F, et al. FREGAT working group. Are thoracotomy and/or intrathoracic anastomosis
                   still predictors of postoperative mortality after esophageal cancer surgery? A nationwide study. Ann Surg 2017;266:854-62.
               14.   Mariette C, Markar SR, Dabakuyo-Yonli TS, Meunier B, Pezet D, et al. FREGAT working group. Hybrid Minimally Invasive
                   Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer. N Engl J Med 2019;380:152-62.
               15.   Bizekis C, Kent MS, Luketich JD, Buenaventura PO, Landreneau RJ, et al. Initial experience with Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis
                   Esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 2006;82:402-7.
               16.   Noble F, Kelly JJ, Bailey IS, Byrne JP, Underwood TJ. A prospective comparison of totally minimally invasive versus open Ivor Lewis
                   esophagectomy. Dis Esophagus 2013;26:263-71.
               17.   Xie MR, Liu CQ, Guo MF, Mei XY, Sun XH, et al. Short-term outcomes of minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal
                   cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 2014;97:1721-7.
               18.   Chen X, Yang J, Peng J, Jiang H. Case-matched analysis of combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic versus open esophagectomy for
                   esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Clin Exp Med 2015;8:13516-23.
               19.   Sihag S, Kosinski AS, Gaissert HA, Wright CD, Schipper PH. Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer:
                   a comparison of early surgical outcomes from the society of thoracic surgeons national database. Ann Thorac Surg 2016;101:1281-9.
               20.   Tapias LF, Mathisen DJ, Wright CD, Wain JC, Gaissert HA, et al. Outcomes with open and minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy
                   after neoadjuvant therapy. Ann Thorac Surg 2016;101:1097-103.
               21.   Wang J, Xu M, Xie M, Mei X. Minimally Invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy (MIILE): a single-center experience. Indian J Surg
                   2017;79:319-25.
               22.   Straatman J, van der Wielen N, Cuesta MA, Daams F, Roig Garcia J, et al. Minimally invasive versus open esophageal resection: three-
                   year follow-up of the previously reported randomized controlled trial: the TIME trial. Ann Surg 2017;266:232-6.
               23.   Qi W, Zixiang W, Tianwei Z, Shuai F, Sai Z, et al. Long-term outcomes of 530 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients with
                   minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. J Surg Oncol 2018;117:957-69.
               24.   van Workum F, Stenstra M, Berkelmans G, Slaman AE, van Berge Henegouwen MI, et al. Learning curve and associated morbidity of
                   minimally invasive esophagectomy: a retrospective multicenter study. Ann Surg 2019;269:88-94.
               25.   Mungo B, Lidor AO, Stem M, Molena D. Early experience and lessons learned in a new minimally invasive esophagectomy program.
                   Surg Endosc 2016;30:1692-1698.
               26.   Woodard GA, Crockard JC, Clary-Macy C, Zoon-Besselink CT, Jones K, et al. Hybrid minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy
                   after neoadjuvant chemoradiation yields excellent long-term survival outcomes with minimal morbidity. J Surg Oncol 2016;114:838-47.
               27.   Maas KW, Cuesta MA, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Roig J, Bonavina L, et al. Quality of life and late complications after minimally
                   invasive compared to open esophagectomy: results of a randomized trial. World J Surg 2015;39:1986-93.
   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157