Page 50 - Read Online

Abe et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2023;7:28 https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2023.15 Page 13 of 14

approved this study (Approval No. ACC 2021-0-046).

Consent for publication
We have obtained patient consent for the publication of the data and research.

Copyright
© The Author(s) 2023.

REFERENCES
1. Takeuchi H, Miyata H, Gotoh M, et al. A risk model for esophagectomy using data of 5354 patients included in a japanese nationwide
web-based database. Ann Surg 2014;260:259-66. DOI
2. Matsubara T, Ueda M, Yanagida O, Nakajima T, Nishi M. How extensive should lymph node dissection be for cancer of the thoracic
esophagus? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994;107:1073-8. DOI PubMed
3. Igaki H, Tachimori Y, Kato H. Improved survival for patients with upper and/or middle mediastinal lymph node metastasis of
squamous cell carcinoma of the lower thoracic esophagus treated with 3-field dissection. Ann Surg 2004;239:483-90. DOI PubMed
PMC
4. Oshikiri T, Goto H, Horikawa M, et al. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy reduces the risk of recurrent laryngeal nerve
palsy. Ann Surg Oncol 2021;28:7258. DOI
5. Ninomiya I, Okamoto K, Yamaguchi T, et al. Optimization of robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the lateral decubitus
position. Esophagus 2021;18:482-8. DOI
6. Daiko H, Oguma J, Fujiwara H, et al. Robotic esophagectomy with total mediastinal lymphadenectomy using four robotic arms alone
in esophageal and esophagogastric cancer (RETML-4): a prospective feasibility study. Esophagus 2021;18:203-10. DOI
7. Fujita T, Sato K, Ozaki A, et al. Propensity-matched analysis of the short-term outcome of robot-assisted minimally invasive
esophagectomy versus conventional thoracoscopic esophagectomy in thoracic esophageal cancer. World J Surg 2022;46:1926-33.
DOI
8. Meyer P, Sublon R. [Considerations on the interpleural ligament (De Morosow)]. Arch Anat Pathol 1961;9:111-5. PubMed
9. Matsubara T, Ueda M, Nagao N, Takahashi T, Nakajima T, Nishi M. Cervicothoracic approach for total mesoesophageal dissection in
cancer of the thoracic esophagus. J Am Coll Surg 1998;187:238-45. DOI PubMed
10. Hosoi T, Abe T, Higaki E, et al. Circular stapled technique versus modified collard technique for cervical esophagogastric anastomosis
after esophagectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2022;276:30-7. DOI
11. Rice TW, Ishwaran H, Hofstetter WL, et al. Recommendations for pathologic staging (pTNM) of cancer of the esophagus and
esophagogastric junction for the 8th edition AJCC/UICC staging manuals. Dis Esophagus 2016;29:897-905. DOI PubMed PMC
12. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann
Surg 2009;250:187-96. DOI
13. Hernandez JM, Dimou F, Weber J, et al. Defining the learning curve for robotic-assisted esophagogastrectomy. J Gastrointest Surg
2013;17:1346-51. DOI PubMed
14. de la Fuente SG, Weber J, Hoffe SE, Shridhar R, Karl R, Meredith KL. Initial experience from a large referral center with robotic-
assisted Ivor Lewis esophagogastrectomy for oncologic purposes. Surg Endosc 2013;27:3339-47. DOI PubMed
15. Park SY, Kim DJ, Kang DR, Haam SJ. Learning curve for robotic esophagectomy and dissection of bilateral recurrent laryngeal nerve
nodes for esophageal cancer. Dis Esophagus 2017;30:1-9. DOI PubMed
16. Tsunoda S, Obama K, Hisamori S, et al. Lower incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications following robot-assisted
minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: propensity score-matched comparison to conventional minimally invasive
esophagectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2021;28:639-47. DOI
17. Yang Y, Li B, Yi J, et al. Robot-assisted versus conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy for resectable esophageal squamous
cell carcinoma: early results of a multicenter randomized controlled trial: the RAMIE trial. Ann Surg 2022;275:646-53. DOI
18. Angeramo CA, Bras Harriott C, Casas MA, Schlottmann F. Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: robot-assisted versus
laparoscopic-thoracoscopic technique. Systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgery 2021;170:1692-701. DOI PubMed
19. Chao YK, Li ZG, Wen YW, et al. Robotic-assisted esophagectomy vs video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy (REVATE): study
protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2019;20:346. DOI PubMed PMC
20. Oshikiri T, Takiguchi G, Hasegawa H, et al. Postoperative recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy is associated with pneumonia in minimally
invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc 2021;35:837-44. DOI
21. He H, Wu Q, Wang Z, et al. Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a
propensity score matched analysis. J Cardiothorac Surg 2018;13:52. DOI PubMed PMC
22. Deng HY, Luo J, Li SX, et al. Does robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy really have the advantage of lymphadenectomy
over video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy in treating esophageal squamous cell carcinoma? A propensity
score-matched analysis based on short-term outcomes. Dis Esophagus 2019;32:doy110. DOI
23. Zhang Y, Han Y, Gan Q, et al. Early outcomes of robot-assisted versus thoracoscopic-assisted ivor lewis esophagectomy for