Page 81 - Read Online
P. 81

Page 2 of 20           Nakamura et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2022;6:50  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2022.38

               INTRODUCTION
               Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is currently a standard treatment for intramucosal neoplasia in the
               stomach. The ESD provides about ten times higher en bloc resection rate (92.4% vs. 51.7%, OR: 9.69), five
               times higher histological complete resection rate (82.1% vs. 42.2%, OR: 5.66), and one tenth recurrence rate
                                                                           [1]
               (0.76% vs. 6.4%, OR: 0.10) than endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) . The effectiveness of ESD for the
               treatment of EGC patients has been proven by good long-term outcomes in multicenter prospective
                     [2,3]
               studies .
               Despite excellent published outcomes, there is still a paucity of details about the basic concept and
               technique of the ESD procedures. In this article, we impart practical information necessary for the proper
               execution of the technique based on our experiences and currently available knowledge. We believe an
               advanced procedure is accomplished with the accumulation of solid basic procedures.


               PREPARATION
               Equipment
               Endoscopes
               An endoscope with a small bending radius and a water-jet function is suitable for gastric ESD. A wide
               working channel diameter of ≥ 3.2 mm, for example, the GIF-Q260J, GIF-H290T, GIF-1TH190 (all by
               Olympus, Co., Ltd.), or EG-L580RD7 (Fujifilm Medical Systems, Co., Ltd.), is preferred because, in the case
               of bleeding, water or air can be suctioned while the hemostatic devices are kept inserted in the working
               channel.


               If the lesion is located at the fornix, the gastric angle, or the anterior wall of the lower corpus, where the
               endoscopic approach is difficult, a multibending video endoscope such as the GIF-2TQ260M (Olympus,
               Co., Ltd.) is useful. The scope has proximal two-way bending in addition to distal four-way deflection.


               Transparent attachment
               For gastric ESD, a transparent attachment on the tip of the endoscope is necessary. During mucosal
               incision, the attachment stabilizes the operative field and applies adequate tension to the target mucosa. In
               submucosal dissection, the dissected specimen is lifted, and working space is created for continuous
               submucosal dissection. In the case of bleeding, it can separate surrounding tissue around the area of
               bleeding and facilitate the identification of the bleeding point. Because each device has a different
               appropriate working distance, the protrusion length of the attachment must be adjusted. Usually, a long
               attachment with a protrusion length of 4-6 mm is selected for the needle-type knife or scissor-type knife,
               while a short attachment with a protrusion length of 2 mm is often selected for the insulated tip-type knife.
               In cases of severe fibrosis or poor accessibility to the submucosal space is expected, and the tunneling
               method is selected, a tapered-tip attachment, such as the ST hood (Fujifilm, Co., Ltd.), would be useful.


               Insufflation gas
               Two meta-analyses indicated that CO  insufflation significantly reduced post-procedural abdominal pain
                                                2
               but did not affect other clinical outcomes such as en bloc resection rate, procedure time, incidence of
               adverse events, etc. of gastric ESD . The influence of the type of insufflated gas may be less significant than
                                           [4,5]
               that of colonic or esophageal ESD. However, CO  insufflation is advantageous over air insufflation in the
                                                         2
               case of unexpected complications, especially perforation.
   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86