Page 36 - Read Online
P. 36

Page 4 of 8           Wagaskar et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2022;6:14  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2021.106

               DATA-EXTRACTION
               Table 1 shows the summary of included studies that were finalized after evidence acquisition and search
               strategy. It involves sample size, study design, the definition of OMPC, and the selected approach - CRP,
               PFS, CCS, and OS [Table 1].


               RESULTS
               Our search identified 524 records. After excluding duplication, 54 full-text articles were identified and were
               screened for eligibility. We found nine papers (863 patients) that met the inclusion criteria for the review.
               Four studies were retrospective; four were population-based. One study was prospective.


                              [7]
               Heidenreich et al.  assessed 113 patients with osseous MPC who underwent CRP. The results showed 80%
               5-year OS, 9% risk of surgery-related complications, and 68% urinary continence at 12 months after CRP.
               Sooriakumaran et al.  retrospectively assessed 106 patients with MPC who underwent CRP with extended
                                 [11]
               lymphadenectomy. They reported 89% OS at 23 months, 64% urinary continence at 3 months, and 14%
               surgery-related complications. Jang et al.  retrospectively reviewed records of 79 men with OMPC, 38 of
                                                  [12]
               whom underwent robot-assisted CRP. They found 75% PFS in patients with RA-CRP vs. 40% PFS in men
               without RA-CRP at 40 months. Additionally, 5% of men experienced surgery-related complications in the
                                      [13]
               RA-CRP group. Culp et al.  used a population-based SEER database of 8185 men with MPC of whom 245
               underwent CRP. They reported CSS of 76% in CRP vs. 61% with non-CRP men at 5 years. The authors also
                                                                                                [14]
               noted OS at 5 years at 67% in the CRP group vs. 53% in the non-CRP group. Gandaglia et al.  analyzed
               perioperative and long-term (7 years) oncologic outcomes of radical prostatectomy in a selected cohort of
               11 patients with OMPC treated with RP and extended pelvic lymph node dissection. PFS was 45% and CSM
                                                                                 [15]
               was 82% with 18% of grade 3 post-operative complications. Satkunasivam et al.  assessed survival following
               local therapy in comparison with no local therapy for 4069 men with metastatic prostate cancer from the
               SEER-Medicare linked database. RP compared to NLT was associated with a 52% reduction in the risk of
               prostate cancer-specific mortality (HR = 0.48, 95%CI: 0.27-0.85). OS at 3 years was 73% for RP.
                          [16]
               Gratzke et al.  reported the results of 1538 patients from the Munich Cancer Registry with newly
               diagnosed MPCa. Of these, 1464 patients (95%) without surgery (RP-) vs. 74 patients (5%) underwent
               RP+ . Patients in the RP+ group showed a 55% 5-year OS rate compared with 21% in the RP- group (P <
                   [16]
               0.01). Antwi et al.  evaluated 7858 patients obtained from the SEER program who underwent RP or BT. In
                              [17]
               the RP group, they found a 73% (HR = 0.27, 95%CI: 0.20-0.38) lower risk of all-cause mortality and 72% (HR
                                                                             [17]
               = 0.28, 95%CI: 0.20-0.39) reduced risk of death from prostate cancer . Poelaert et al.  prospectively
                                                                                            [18]
               compared early results of 36 patients with cytoreductive radical prostatectomy (17) vs. no local treatment
               (29). RP group patients were younger (64 years vs. 72 years, P = 0.005), had lower initial prostate-specific
               antigen (15.9 g/L vs. 156 g/L, P = 0.002), and less high-volume metastatic disease (5.9% vs. 69%, P < 0.001).
               At 3 months 2 (6.8%), 11 (37.9%), and 2 (6.8%), patients suffered urge incontinence, obstructive voiding
               needing medical intervention, and ureteric obstruction, and 5 (29.4%) and 2 (11.8%) patients suffered grades
               1 and 2 post-operative complications .
                                              [18]

               DISCUSSION
               Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is the most common form of treatment in men with organ-
               confined prostate cancer . RARP has shown promising results in locally advanced prostate cancer
                                     [19]
               treatment . Here we reviewed 9 papers (4 retrospective, 4 population-based and 1 prospective) for
                       [20]
               oncological and functional outcomes of cytoreductive radical prostatectomy (open or robot-assisted) in
               OMPC settings. We identified 3 key themes: (1) improved overall survival statistics (PFS, OS, CSS) are seen
               after CRP for men with OMPC compared to men without CRP; (2) CPR is shown to be feasible and safe
               (fewer surgery-related complication rates with acceptable functional outcomes) with cytoreductive
   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41